Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000494

UI2026000494

UI2026000494 [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000494 (22 April 2026)

Upper Tribunal held there was no material error of law in dismissing an EUSS appeal based on a finding that the marriage was one of convenience.

  • Marriage of convenience
  • Euss applications
  • Devaseelan guidelines
  • Proxy marriage validity
  • Burden of proof in immigration appeals
  • Immigration-appeals
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2024] UKAITUR UI2023003850

UI2023003850

UI2023003850 [2024] UKAITUR UI2023003850 (6 December 2024)

The Upper Tribunal held that Ms Nyarko’s earlier limited leave to remain was not curtailed by a later derivative residence card, so she was not entitled to EUSS status as a Zambrano carer.

  • Zambrano carers
  • Appendix fm
  • Derivative residence card
  • Article 8 echr
  • Appendix eu
  • Section 3c leave
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2024] UKAITUR UI2022002034

UI2022002034

UI2022002034 [2024] UKAITUR UI2022002034 (31 May 2024)

The Upper Tribunal set aside a First-tier Tribunal decision allowing an EUSS appeal, holding the appellant lacked a relevant document and could not rely on the Withdrawal Agreement.

  • Euss applications
  • Durable partner definition
  • Withdrawal agreement
  • Proportionality
  • Error of law
  • Immigration-law
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2024] UKAITUR UI2023005417

UI2023005417 & Ors

UI2023005417 & Ors [2024] UKAITUR UI2023005417 (21 March 2024)

The Upper Tribunal set aside a First-tier Tribunal decision after late disclosure of evidence caused procedural unfairness and the judge failed to engage with new evidence.

  • Euss applications
  • Procedural fairness
  • Adjournment refusal
  • Devaseelan guidance
  • Abuse of rights
  • Remittal
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2024] UKAITUR UI2023001049

UI2023001049

UI2023001049 [2024] UKAITUR UI2023001049 (31 January 2024)

The Upper Tribunal allowed this immigration appeal to a limited extent, finding the appellant had made a valid pre-31 December 2020 application under the 2016 Regulations.

  • Withdrawal agreement
  • Euss applications
  • 2016 regulations
  • Extended family member applications
  • Immigration-law
  • Withdrawal-agreement
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2023] UKAITUR UI2023003183

UI2023003183

UI2023003183 [2023] UKAITUR UI2023003183 (7 November 2023)

Upper Tribunal held there was no error of law in dismissing an EUSS appeal about a marriage of convenience and upheld the First-tier Tribunal decision.

  • Euss applications
  • Marriage of convenience
  • Burden of proof
  • Appeals process
  • Immigration-law
  • Euss
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2023] UKAITUR UI2023001516

UI2023001516

UI2023001516 [2023] UKAITUR UI2023001516 (2 November 2023)

The Upper Tribunal set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s finding that a marriage was one of convenience, holding that it applied the wrong test and admitted unfair late evidence.

  • Euss applications
  • Marriage of convenience
  • Procedural fairness
  • Burden of proof
  • Immigration-law
  • Euss
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2023] UKAITUR UI2023000918

UI2023000918

UI2023000918 [2023] UKAITUR UI2023000918 (6 July 2023)

The Upper Tribunal set aside a First-tier Tribunal decision in an EUSS appeal, finding errors on evidence handling and the burden of proof in a marriage of convenience case.

  • Marriage of convenience
  • Burden of proof
  • Euss applications
  • Citizens' rights appeals
  • Immigration-appeals
  • Euss
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2023] UKAITUR EA026192022

EA026192022

EA026192022 [2023] UKAITUR EA026192022 (17 May 2023)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal against an EUSS refusal, holding there was no material error in the First-tier Tribunal’s evidence assessment.

  • Euss applications
  • Marriage of convenience
  • Citizens' rights appeals
  • Assessment of evidence
  • Euss-applications
  • Marriage-of-convenience
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2023] UKAITUR EA118352021

EA118352021

EA118352021 [2023] UKAITUR EA118352021 (30 April 2023)

The Upper Tribunal set aside a First-tier Tribunal decision on an EUSS appeal, holding that the judge misdirected himself on the burden of proof in a marriage of convenience case.

  • Burden of proof
  • Marriage of convenience
  • Euss applications
  • Procedural fairness
  • Immigration-law
  • Euss
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.