Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000583

UI2026000583

UI2026000583 [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000583 (22 April 2026)

Upper Tribunal dismissed an Afghan appellant’s challenge to a refused protection claim, holding the First-tier Tribunal made no error in law on representation, Article 3, credibility, or Pakistan relocation.

  • Asylum
  • Article 3 echr
  • Article 8 echr
  • Credibility assessment
  • Legal representation
  • Removal to afghanistan
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] UKAITUR UI2025005751

UI2025005751

UI2025005751 [2026] UKAITUR UI2025005751 (16 April 2026)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed an immigration human rights appeal, finding the appellant’s non-attendance was her own choice and that Article 3 was not a required issue.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Article 8 echr
  • Article 3 echr
  • Appeal procedure
  • Legal representation
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] UKAITUR UI2025000351

UI2025000351 & UI2025000352

UI2025000351 & UI2025000352 [2025] UKAITUR UI2025000351 (22 August 2025)

The Upper Tribunal dismissed an error of law appeal in an entry clearance case, finding the appellants knew of the hearing date and that there was no procedural unfairness.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Article 8 echr
  • Article 6 echr
  • Entry clearance
  • Litigants in person
  • Adjournment
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 170

Vassallo v Mizuho International PLC & Anor

Vassallo v Mizuho International PLC & Anor [2024] EAT 170 (19 June 2024)

The EAT dismissed an appeal against refusal to amend an employment claim, holding the judge was entitled to find whistleblowing and unfair dismissal claims had been deliberately omitted.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Whistleblowing
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Indirect associative discrimination
  • Legal representation
  • Balance of injustice
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] UKPC 18

Vinson Ariste (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) (Bahamas)

The Privy Council allowed Vinson Ariste’s appeal, quashing his robbery conviction after finding the confession should not have been admitted and the verdict unsafe.

  • Admissibility of confession evidence
  • Right to fair trial
  • Legal representation
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Confession-evidence
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2021] UKAITUR PA116632019

PA116632019

PA116632019 [2021] UKAITUR PA116632019 (13 January 2021)

Upper Tribunal dismissed an Iraqi asylum appellant’s challenge, finding no material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s refusal to adjourn or proceed unrepresented.

  • Adjournment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Legal representation
  • International protection
  • Error of law
  • Immigration-law
Read case analysis
Immigration [2018] UKAITUR PA035402018

PA035402018

PA035402018 [2018] UKAITUR PA035402018 (24 August 2018)

The Upper Tribunal found a material error of law in an asylum appeal, holding that alleged procedural unfairness and missing evidence may have affected credibility findings.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Legal representation
  • Error of law
  • Remittal
  • Asylum
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2017] UKAITUR HU022462016

HU022462016

HU022462016 [2017] UKAITUR HU022462016 (11 December 2017)

Upper Tribunal dismissed an immigration appeal, finding no material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal’s handling of representation, vulnerability, and proportionality.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Vulnerable witnesses
  • Adjournment
  • Legal representation
  • Medical evidence
  • Immigration-appeal
Read case analysis
Immigration [2016] UKAITUR AA100552014

AA100552014

AA100552014 [2016] UKAITUR AA100552014 (20 July 2016)

The Upper Tribunal refused permission to appeal and would have dismissed the appeal, finding no procedural unfairness in the service of the hearing notice.

  • Deportation order
  • Procedural fairness
  • Service of notice
  • Legal representation
  • Deportation-order
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2016] UKAITUR DA010922014

DA010922014

DA010922014 [2016] UKAITUR DA010922014 (26 February 2016)

The Upper Tribunal held that the First-tier Tribunal’s hearing was procedurally unfair, set aside its decision, and remitted the deportation appeal for a fresh hearing.

  • Deportation
  • Procedural fairness
  • Legal representation
  • Exceptional case funding
  • Adjournment of hearings
  • Procedural-fairness
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.