Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Odusanya v Pennine Care Foundation Trust & Ors (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2026] EAT 5 (16 January 2026)
The EAT set aside an ET strike-out after finding the claimant was wrongly denied advice from her newly instructed representative before responding.
Elden v Revenue and Customs [2026] UKFTT 41 (TC) (08 January 2026)
HMRC’s strike-out application was refused after repeated procedural non-compliance, though the Tribunal criticised the appellant’s representative for inaccurate AI-assisted case summaries.
Staffordshire County Council v Lowers (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Consequences of Strike-Out) [2024] EAT 110 (14 June 2024)
The EAT upheld strike-out of the respondent’s defence for repeated non-compliance, but noted one error: remedy participation had not been considered.
Kaur v Sun Mark Ltd & Ors (Practice and Procedure - Striking Out - Rule 37(1)(b) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013) [2024] EAT 41 (21 March 2024)
The EAT dismissed an appeal against strike-out of a remedy claim after finding the claimant had destroyed or concealed evidence relevant to the proceedings.
Michelangelo Ltd (substituted as appellant for Michelangelo Fashions Ltd) v Revenue & Customs (IMPORT RESTRICTIONS (CUSTOMS) - handbags made of python and crocodile skin seized) [2019] UKFTT 316 (TC) (16 May 2019)
The Tribunal found the refusal to restore seized crocodile and python handbags was unreasonable and disproportionate, and directed a further review.
Michelangelo Ltd (substituted as appellant for Michelangelo Fashions Ltd) v Revenue & Customs (IMPORT RESTRICTIONS (CUSTOMS) - handbags made of python and crocodile skin seized) [2019] UKFTT 316 (TC) (16 May 2019)
The tribunal found Border Force’s refusal to restore seized crocodile and python handbags unreasonable and disproportionate, and directed a fresh review.
Easteye Ltd v Environment Agency - ESOS E Team [2018] UKFTT NV_2018_0018 (GRC) (4 March 2019)
The Tribunal partly allowed an appeal against an ESOS civil penalty, reducing it from £8,190 to £6,322 after finding the original amount disproportionate.
Chidzoy v. British Broadcasting Corporation [2018] UKEAT 0097_17_0504 (5 April 2018)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld strike out of a journalist’s claims after she discussed her evidence with a journalist during cross-examination, despite repeated warnings.
Forster -Copperi v Director of Border Revenue (EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF GOODS (see also EXCISE APPEAL) : Other) [2016] UKFTT 157 (TC) (04 March 2016)
The tribunal allowed an appeal against refusal to restore a seized whalebone sculpture, finding the Border Force failed to assess proportionality and relevant circumstances.
Forster -Copperi v Director of Border Revenue (EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF GOODS (see also EXCISE APPEAL) : Other) [2016] UKFTT 157 (TC) (04 March 2016)
The Tribunal allowed an appeal against refusal to restore a seized whalebone sculpture, holding the Border Force failed to apply proportionality and relevant considerations.
Explore more
