Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment law [2026] EAT 62

Ikeji v Westminster City Council & Anor (Practice and procedure; costs; whether Tribunal erred in concluding that claimant had been dishonest about a fact central to his claim of victimisation)

Ikeji v Westminster City Council & Anor (Practice and procedure; costs; whether Tribunal erred in concluding that claimant had been dishonest about a fact central to his claim of victimisation) [2026] EAT 62 (21 April 2026)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal refused appeals against a costs order and reconsideration refusal, holding the tribunal was entitled to find the appellant had knowingly lied about his ORR employment status.

  • Victimisation
  • Costs
  • Dishonesty
  • Protected acts
  • Equality act 2010
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 28

Fullah v Medical Research Council & Ors (Victimisation)

Fullah v Medical Research Council & Ors (Victimisation) [2026] EAT 28 (20 February 2026)

The EAT held that the Employment Tribunal failed to answer the remitted causation question in a victimisation claim and sent the case back again.

  • Victimisation
  • Protected acts
  • Causation
  • Remittal procedure
  • Burden of proof
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 26

Nowak v Evtec Aluminium Ltd (Race Discrimination - Victimisation)

Nowak v Evtec Aluminium Ltd (Race Discrimination - Victimisation) [2026] EAT 26 (06 February 2026)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed an appeal against findings rejecting race discrimination and victimisation claims and held there was no live Working Time Regulations complaint.

  • Race discrimination
  • Victimisation
  • Working time regulations
  • Burden of proof
  • Direct discrimination
  • Protected acts
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 160

Szucs v Greensquare Group Ltd v Greensquare Group Ltd (VICTIMISATION)

Szucs v Greensquare Group Ltd v Greensquare Group Ltd (VICTIMISATION) [2024] EAT 160 (15 August 2024)

The EAT allowed an appeal in a victimisation claim, holding that the Employment Tribunal gave insufficient reasons on causation and separability, so the case was remitted.

  • Victimisation
  • Burden of proof
  • Causation
  • Protected acts
  • Separability principle
  • Remittal
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 82

First Greater Western Ltd v Moussa (Whistleblowing detriment; s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 - Victimisation; s.27 Equality Act 2010 - Causation; Treatment of the Claimant)

First Greater Western Ltd v Moussa (Whistleblowing detriment; s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 - Victimisation; s.27 Equality Act 2010 - Causation; Treatment of the Claimant) [2024] EAT 82 (24 May 2024)

The EAT dismissed FGW’s appeal, upholding findings that the claimant suffered whistleblowing and victimisation detriments linked to historic protected acts and disclosures.

  • Whistleblowing detriment
  • Victimisation
  • Causation
  • Protected disclosures
  • Protected acts
  • Whistleblowing-detriment
Read case analysis
Employment law [2022] EAT 32

Sun Mark Ltd & Ors v Kaur (SEX DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VICTIMISATION)

Sun Mark Ltd & Ors v Kaur (SEX DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VICTIMISATION) [2022] EAT 32 (25 February 2022)

Employment Appeal Tribunal considered victimisation, harassment and discrimination findings arising from alleged sexual harassment and complaint handling, remitting some issues for reconsideration.

  • Sex discrimination
  • Harassment
  • Victimisation
  • Burden of proof
  • Protected acts
  • Bad faith allegations
Read case analysis
Employment law [2019] UKEAT 0006_19_3107

Mechkarov v Citibank NA

Mechkarov v Citibank NA [2019] UKEAT 0006_19_3107 (31 July 2019)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed Mr Mechkarov’s appeal, holding that the tribunal’s findings on race discrimination and victimisation were adequately reasoned and not perverse.

  • Direct race discrimination
  • Victimisation
  • Protected acts
  • Credibility assessment
  • Adequacy of tribunal reasoning
  • Employment-discrimination
Read case analysis
Employment law [2019] UKEAT 0304_18_1906

Page v. Lord Chancellor & Anor (Rev 1)

Page v. Lord Chancellor & Anor (Rev 1) [2019] UKEAT 0304_18_1906 (19 June 2019)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed Richard Page’s appeal, upholding findings that his removal as a magistrate was not victimisation and was proportionate.

  • Victimisation
  • Direct discrimination
  • Judicial conduct
  • Freedom of expression (article 10 echr)
  • Equality act 2010
  • Protected acts
Read case analysis
Employment law [2018] UKEAT 0050_18_1608

Oladipo v Lush Retail Ltd

Oladipo v Lush Retail Ltd [2018] UKEAT 0050_18_1608 (16 August 2018)

The EAT remitted a victimisation claim for rehearing because the tribunal had not clearly addressed key evidence, witness absence, and decision-makers' knowledge of protected acts.

  • Victimisation
  • Direct race discrimination
  • Dismissal
  • Burden of proof
  • Protected acts
  • Equal-opportunities
Read case analysis
Employment law [2015] UKEAT 0430_14_1507

Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v Blake (Victimisation Discrimination: Other forms of victimisation)

Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v Blake (Victimisation Discrimination: Other forms of victimisation) [2015] UKEAT 0430_14_1507 (15 July 2015)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the employer’s appeal, holding that the tribunal gave inadequate reasons on victimisation and misapplied the unfair dismissal test.

  • Victimisation
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Protected acts
  • Reasonableness of dismissal
  • Burden of proof
  • Unfair-dismissal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.