Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Privy Council restored the High Court’s dismissal of a fire officer’s promotion challenge, holding the executive sets qualifications and no equivalent-qualification determination was shown.
The Privy Council held that Fire Service promotion qualifications were set by the executive, not the PSC, and restored dismissal of Ian Green’s claim.
JR2025LON001050 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON001050 (30 April 2026)
Judicial review over an entry clearance vignette and removal was dismissed. The Tribunal held the vignette was issued in error and the refusal and removal were lawful.
JR2025LON002131 & Ors [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON002131 (21 April 2026)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed a judicial review challenge to 20 DATV refusals, holding the UK transit route was not shown to be reasonable and credibility concerns were lawful.
JR2025LON000739 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON000739 (21 April 2026)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed a judicial review challenging an invalid Skilled Worker application rejection, holding the Secretary of State owed no further reasons.
Meydan Asset Management Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Accelerated Payment Notices; Late payment penalties; Reasonable excuse; Special circumstances; Schedule 56 FA 2009; APN regime) [2026] UKFTT 613 (TC) (21 April 2026)
The Tribunal dismissed Meydan Asset Management Ltd’s appeal against late payment penalties for unpaid APNs, rejecting reasonable excuse and special circumstances arguments.
The Privy Council dismissed an appeal over disciplinary charges against a Trinidad and Tobago State Solicitor, holding judicial review was not barred by an effective alternative remedy.
JR2025LON002648 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON002648 (15 April 2026)
Upper Tribunal dismissed a judicial review of a student leave refusal, holding that the applicant was not denied fairness despite no prior “minded to” notice on deception.
JR2024LON001256 [2026] UKAITUR JR2024LON001256 (18 March 2026)
The Upper Tribunal refused to admit an out-of-time judicial review, finding the applicant had fabricated evidence of posting and that his claim was unarguable.
JR2025LON001581 [2026] UKAITUR JR2025LON001581 (11 March 2026)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed a judicial review challenge to the refusal to predetermine family entry-clearance applications without biometrics, finding no Tameside duty breach.
Explore more
