Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2012] UKPC 26

Ray Morgan (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) (Jamaica)

The Privy Council held that the Court of Appeal of Jamaica wrongly refused to hear Ray Morgan’s sentence appeal after administrative errors delayed filing.

  • Right of appeal
  • Filing of grounds of appeal
  • Administrative error
  • Sentencing
  • Remission of sentence
  • Judicial discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] UKPC 10

James Miller (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) (Bahamas)

Privy Council appeal on attempted murder directions, holding the trial judge misdirected the jury on intention but dismissing the appeal because no miscarriage of justice occurred.

  • Attempted murder
  • Intention in criminal law
  • Jury directions
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Attempted-murder
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2014] UKPC 19

Sabapathee v The Director of Public Prosecutions

The Privy Council held that the original non-custodial sentence was too lenient, but reduced the substituted custodial term to 18 months because of delay and proportionality.

  • Sentencing
  • Appeals against sentence
  • Dangerous drugs
  • Double jeopardy
  • Delay in criminal proceedings
  • Appeals-against-sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2013] UKPC 29

Selassie (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent)

The Privy Council held that Bermudian murder sentencing provisions fixed maximum, not mandatory minimum, periods before parole eligibility, and allowed the appeals in part.

  • Sentencing
  • Parole eligibility
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Constitutional validity
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Parole-eligibility
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2013] UKPC 29

Pearman (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent)

The Privy Council held that Bermuda sentencing provisions set maximum, not minimum, parole ineligibility periods, and allowed both appeals in part.

  • Sentencing
  • Parole eligibility
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Constitutional validity
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Parole-eligibility
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.