Sign in
United States Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United States Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

United States decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Federal tort claims act

Postal Service v. Konan

The Supreme Court held that the FTCA postal exception bars claims arising from intentional nondelivery of mail, because “loss” and “miscarriage” include intentional failures to deliver.

  • Postal exception
  • Intentional nondelivery of mail
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Mail delivery claims
  • Tort claims against the united states
  • Federal-tort-claims-act
Read case analysis
Federal tort claims act Postal Service v. Konan

Postal Service v. Konan

The Supreme Court held that the FTCA postal exception bars claims arising from intentional nondelivery of mail, because “loss” and “miscarriage” include such conduct.

  • Postal exception §2680(b)
  • Miscarriage of mail
  • Loss of mail
  • Intentional nondelivery
  • Negligent transmission
  • Ftca
Read case analysis
Administrative law 842 F.3d 711; 2016 WL 6956668; 207 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3621; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21273

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner v. POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent United States Postal Service, Intervenor

The D.C. Circuit upheld the Postal Regulatory Commission’s dismissal of a union complaint over First-Class Mail service standards and found no arbitrary or capricious error.

  • Service standards
  • Annual compliance determination
  • Network rationalization
  • Agency deference (chevron)
  • Agency dismissal of complaints
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Administrative law 403 U.S. App. D.C. 271; 704 F.3d 145; 2013 WL 133080; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 729

GAMEFLY, INC., Petitioner v. POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent United States Postal Service, Intervenor

The D.C. Circuit vacated a Postal Regulatory Commission order because it left residual discrimination in postal treatment without a reasonable explanation.

  • Discrimination in rates and terms of service
  • Remedy and equitable relief
  • Arbitrary and capricious review
  • Rate setting
  • Agency explanation requirement
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United States decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.