Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United States decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court held that §2244(b)(3)(E) does not bar certiorari review of a federal prisoner’s successive-§2255 authorization request and that §2244(b)(1) does not apply to §2255 motions.
The Supreme Court held that § 2255(e)’s saving clause does not let a federal prisoner use § 2241 to raise an intervening statutory-interpretation claim barred by AEDPA.
The Court held that §2255(e)’s saving clause does not let a federal prisoner use §2241 to bypass AEDPA limits on successive §2255 motions for a statutory-interpretation claim.
Explore more
