Sign in
Zambia Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Zambia Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Zambia decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Intellectual property [2024] ZMHC 210

Neelkanth Lime Limited v Wonderful Industries Company Limited (2022/HPC/0807)

Neelkanth Lime Limited v Wonderful Industries Company Limited (2022/HPC/0807) [2024] ZMHC 210 (2 August 2024)

The High Court of Zambia dismissed a trade mark infringement claim, finding no proof that the defendant used the mark in trade without consent.

  • Trade mark infringement
  • Burden of proof
  • Damages
  • Injunctions
  • Trade-mark-infringement
  • Intellectual-property
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] ZMCA 178

DSS Coal Extraction and Suppliers and Ors v Maamba Collieries Limited (APPEAL No. 236/2022)

DSS Coal Extraction and Suppliers and Ors v Maamba Collieries Limited (APPEAL No. 236/2022) [2024] ZMCA 178 (1 August 2024)

The appellants' cause of action accrued in 2011 when the respondent denied liability for payment, and the statutory limitation period expired before the action was commenced in 2019. Ongoing negotiations did not suspend the limitation period. The claim is statute barred and the court lacks jurisdiction.

  • Statute of limitations
  • Jurisdiction
  • Contractual debt
  • Settlement negotiations
Read case analysis
Legal profession regulation [2024] ZMCA 176

Arnold Chikoli v Law Association of Zambia (APPEAL NO. 186 OF 2022)

Arnold Chikoli v Law Association of Zambia (APPEAL NO. 186 OF 2022) [2024] ZMCA 176 (1 August 2024)

The Court found that Section 68 of the Legal Practitioners Act did not apply as the appellant was charged under Sections 52 and 53 for professional misconduct, not under Part VIII for failure to keep accounts. The correct procedure was followed. The parties agreed to proceed without oral evidence before the Disciplinary Committee, so failure to call witnesses was not fatal. The standard of proof was met given the appellant's failure to explain the prolonged withholding of client funds. The power to suspend was properly exercised, and the sanction of striking off was justified by the gravity o…

  • Striking off roll
  • Professional misconduct
  • Failure to account for client funds
  • Procedural fairness
  • Standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings
Read case analysis
Succession law [2024] ZMCA 179

Michal Piort Franciszek Leja (Sued in his capacity as Administrator of the Estate of the late Artemis Vassiliki Benos Leja) v Mercy Maria Benos (Suing in her capacity as beneficiary in the Estate of late Artemis Vassiliki Benos Leja) (APPEAL NO. 406 OF 2023)

Michal Piort Franciszek Leja (Sued in his capacity as Administrator of the Estate of the late Artemis Vassiliki Benos Leja) v Mercy Maria Benos (Suing in her capacity as beneficiary in the Estate of late Artemis Vassiliki Benos Leja) (APPEAL NO. 406 OF 2023) [2024] ZMCA 179 (1 August 2024)

A niece qualifies as a 'near relative' and beneficiary under Section 7(f) of the Intestate Succession Act, as the term 'remoter descendant' includes collateral descendants such as nieces, in line with Zambian cultural context and legislative intent. The High Court did not err in its interpretation or in its orders regarding valuation, sale, and distribution of estate assets. The remaining grounds of appeal lack merit.

  • Intestate succession
  • Definition of near relative
  • Distribution of estate
  • Administrator duties
  • Statutory interpretation
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2024] ZMCA 233

Zambia Breweries Plc and Ors v Securities and Exchange Commission (APPLICATION NO. SP09 OF 2024)

Zambia Breweries Plc and Ors v Securities and Exchange Commission (APPLICATION NO. SP09 OF 2024) [2024] ZMCA 233 (1 August 2024)

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, finding no public-importance point or reasonable prospects of success in the challenge.

  • Leave to appeal
  • Jurisdiction of regulatory authority
  • Finality of litigation
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Court-of-appeal
  • Finality-of-litigation
Read case analysis
Land law [2024] ZMCA 238

Rephidim Institute Limited v The Attorney General (Application NO. SP04 OF 2024)

Rephidim Institute Limited v The Attorney General (Application NO. SP04 OF 2024) [2024] ZMCA 238 (1 August 2024)

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, finding no point of law of public importance and no reasonable prospects of success.

  • Compulsory acquisition of land
  • Bona fide purchaser
  • Certificate of title
  • State powers during emergency
  • Leave to appeal
  • Public importance in appeals
Read case analysis
Contract law [2024] ZMCA 172

Goldman Insurance Limited v Attorney General (Appeal No. 193 of 2022)

Goldman Insurance Limited v Attorney General (Appeal No. 193 of 2022) [2024] ZMCA 172 (1 August 2024)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an insurer’s challenge to encashment of a performance bond, holding the surety had delayed too long and lost the chance to elect a remedy.

  • Performance bonds
  • Breach of contract
  • Mitigation of loss
  • Estoppel
  • Performance-bonds
  • Suretyship
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] ZMCA 169

Sydney Ngoma v National Pension Scheme Authority (APPEAL NO. 228/2022)

Sydney Ngoma v National Pension Scheme Authority (APPEAL NO. 228/2022) [2024] ZMCA 169 (31 July 2024)

There was no evidence of personal or material gain by the appellant to support the charges of abuse of office and corruption. The disciplinary procedure was substantially followed, but the factual basis for the dismissal was lacking. Therefore, the dismissal was not justified on the facts, and the appellant is entitled to damages.

  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Unlawful dismissal
  • Disciplinary procedure
  • Damages for dismissal
Read case analysis
Land law [2024] ZMCA 166

Jonathan Van Blerk v The Attorney General and Ors (APPEAL NO. 338/2023)

Jonathan Van Blerk v The Attorney General and Ors (APPEAL NO. 338/2023) [2024] ZMCA 166 (30 July 2024)

The appellant failed to prove that fraud existed at the time of the original trial or that the State's witness made false or fraudulent representations regarding the purpose of the compulsory acquisition. The subsequent allocation of land to private companies did not establish fraud in the procurement of the judgments. There was no evidence of malafides or deliberate dishonesty at the relevant time. The appeal was therefore dismissed in its entirety.

  • Compulsory acquisition
  • Fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Setting aside judgments
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2024] ZMHC 215

Sunshare Construction Limited v Project IQ Consultancy Limited (2024/HPC/372)

Sunshare Construction Limited v Project IQ Consultancy Limited (2024/HPC/372) [2024] ZMHC 215 (29 July 2024)

The High Court dismissed a plaintiff’s application for partial judgment on admission, finding the defence raised live issues and a counterclaim that required full determination.

  • Judgment on admission
  • Liquidated damages
  • Breach of contract
  • Pleadings
  • Counterclaim
  • Judgment-on-admission
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Zambia decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.