R. v. Gelowitz
- Citation
- 2019 BCSC 914
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 6 May 2019
- Posture
- Criminal Indictment / Sentencing Hearing (oral Reasons; Joint Submission)
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 6 May 2019
- Posture
- Criminal Indictment / Sentencing Hearing (oral Reasons; Joint Submission)
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court accepted the jointly proposed sentence because the offences were serious but the accused demonstrated significant mitigation through family support and rehabilitative steps; the joint disposition (concurrent custodial terms resulting in 42 months new custody), ancillary orders including a 10‑year firearms prohibition under s.109, a DNA order under s.487.051(3), forfeiture of exhibits per Exhibit 2, and credit for two months and five days served, were within a reasonable range and appropriate to denounce and deter the conduct while recognizing rehabilitation prospects.
Court disposition
Guilty pleas accepted; sentence imposed in accordance with joint submission
Orders
- Count 1: 30 months incarceration
- Count 7: 42 months incarceration, concurrent
- Count 8: 44 months plus 5 days incarceration, concurrent; credit for time served of 2 months and 5 days applied
- Total new custody period: 42 months
- 10‑year firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code applicable to all counts
- Order for DNA sample and registration under s.487.051(3) Criminal Code applicable to all counts
- Forfeiture and disposal of exhibits directed in accordance with Exhibit 2
- Stay of proceedings on the remaining counts
02
Material facts
Parties
Regina
Crown Counsel: A.G. VaresiDominic David Joseph Gelowitz
Accused Counsel: P.M. McGowanAmounts and remedies
- Total Sentence Months: 42
- Firearms Prohibition Years: 10
- Credit Time Served Days: 65
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Indictment / Sentencing Hearing (oral Reasons; Joint Submission)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the joint submission on sentence should be accepted
- 02
Appropriate length and concurrency of custodial sentence
- 03
Imposition of firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code
- 04
Order for DNA sample and registration under s.487.051(3) Criminal Code
- 05
Forfeiture/disposal of exhibits
- 06
Credit for time served
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Crown sought acceptance of a joint sentencing submission specifying custodial terms (30, 42 and 44 months plus five days on respective counts, to run concurrently for a total of 42 months new custody), requested a 10‑year firearms prohibition under s.109, a DNA order under s.487.051(3), forfeiture and disposal of exhibits as set out in Exhibit 2, and a stay of proceedings on remaining counts.
- Respondent
- Defence supported the joint submission and emphasized mitigating factors: the accused's supportive family, evidence of rehabilitation efforts including education and employment since release on charge, and the accused's promise and prospects; urged acceptance of the joint recommendation.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal sentencing jurisprudence and statutory purpose of sentencing
Sentencing must reflect denunciation and deterrence for serious offences
- 02
Common law principle regarding joint submissions (sentencing jurisprudence)
Courts may accept a joint submission on sentence where it is within a reasonable range and justified by mitigation
- 03
Criminal Code, s.109
Firearms prohibition may be imposed under s.109 of the Criminal Code
- 04
Criminal Code, s.487.051(3)
Court may order collection and registration of DNA samples under s.487.051(3) of the Criminal Code
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court accepted the jointly proposed sentence because the offences were serious but the accused demonstrated significant mitigation through family support and rehabilitative steps; the joint disposition (concurrent custodial terms resulting in 42 months new custody), ancillary orders including a 10‑year firearms prohibition under s.109, a DNA order under s.487.051(3), forfeiture of exhibits per Exhibit 2, and credit for two months and five days served, were within a reasonable range and appropriate to denounce and deter the conduct while recognizing rehabilitation prospects.
Obiter and limits
- The offences involving firearms and cocaine trafficking impose significant harm on society and warrant denunciation and deterrence
- The accused has demonstrated promise through education and employment and must not squander the rehabilitative opportunity
Court disposition
Guilty pleas accepted; sentence imposed in accordance with joint submission
- Count 1: 30 months incarceration
- Count 7: 42 months incarceration, concurrent
- Count 8: 44 months plus 5 days incarceration, concurrent; credit for time served of 2 months and 5 days applied
- Total new custody period: 42 months
- 10‑year firearms prohibition under s.109 Criminal Code applicable to all counts
- Order for DNA sample and registration under s.487.051(3) Criminal Code applicable to all counts
- Forfeiture and disposal of exhibits directed in accordance with Exhibit 2
- Stay of proceedings on the remaining counts
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of British Columbia · 6 May 2019
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Judgment· 6 May 2019
2019 BCSC 914 R. v. Gelowitz
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Gelowitz, 2019 BCSC 914 Date: 20190506 Docket: 33201-3 Registry: Williams Lake Regina v. Dominic David Joseph Gelowitz Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hori Oral Reasons for Sentence Counsel for the Crown: A.G. Varesi Counsel for the Defence: P.M. McGowan Place and Date of Hearing: Williams Lake, B.C. May 6, 2019 Place and Date of Judgment: Williams Lake, B.C. May 6, 2019 [1] THE COURT: I understand that on January 29, 2019, Mr. Gelowitz entered guilty pleas to Counts 1, 7, and 8 of the indictment. I have heard submissions this afternoon on a joint submission for sentencing. [2] The offences to which Mr. Gelowitz has pled guilty are very serious offences. They involve the possession of firearms and they involve the possession of cocaine for the purposes of trafficking. These offences, as we all know in this day and age, impose an extreme amount of hardship and difficulty on society as a whole. So I must say that the offences for which you have pled guilty are very serious and we must take steps to deter and denounce that kind of behaviour in our society. [3] However, I have heard submissions on your behalf and read the letters of support that your counsel has provided to the court showing that you have a very supportive and loving family behind you and that they are in a position to support you going forward. I am also
struck by the steps that you have taken to start your rehabilitative process, in terms of your education and in terms of your employment, since being released after being charged. You appear to have, based on what I have heard, a great deal of promise, and you must not squander that. [4] Based upon the submissions that I have heard, I am prepared to accept the joint submission on sentencing. So, in particular, the sentence to be imposed upon you, Mr. Gelowitz, is: a) on Count 1 - 30 months of jail time; b) on Count 7 - 42 months' jail time, concurrent; and c) on Count 8 - 44 months, plus five days jail, less credit for time served of two months and five days, concurrent. [5] I have not done the math, Mr. Varesi, but I understand that that totals 42 months of new time -- [6] MR. VARESI: Yes. [7] THE COURT: -- for all three counts? [8] MR. VARESI: Yes. [9] THE COURT: In addition, there will be a 10‑year firearms prohibition under s. 109 of the Criminal Code, and there will be an order for a DNA sample and registration under 487.051(3) of the Criminal Code. [10] Is there anything else? [11] MR. VARESI: Yes. Crown directs a stay of proceedings on the remaining counts. And, My Lord, in terms of forfeiture by agreement, what I've done is I've typed up how the exhibits are to be disposed of. So if this could be marked as the next document on sentencing, and I'd just ask Your Lordship
to endorse it, and I'll prepare the order and forward it in due course. So if I may approach the -- [12] THE COURT: Yes. [13] MR. VARESI: -- Madam Registrar? [14] THE COURT: So mark that Exhibit 2? [15] MR. VARESI: Yes, please. EXHIBIT 2 ON SENTENCE - Forfeiture Order re Indictment 33201-3. [16] THE CLERK: My Lord, with respect to the 10‑year prohibition and DNA, can I clarify with the court which counts those prohibitions apply to? [17] THE COURT: Mr. Varesi? [18] MR. VARESI: To all -- all counts . . . [inaudible]. [19] THE COURT: All counts -- [20] MR. VARESI: They're all -- they all attract the firearms ban -- [21] THE COURT: Yes. [22] MR. VARESI: -- and DNA. Thank you. [23] THE COURT: So, Mr. Varesi, you would like me to endorse this forfeiture order? [24] MR. VARESI: Yes, My Lord, and -- [25] THE COURT: Mr. McGowan, any issue with that? [26] MR. MCGOWAN: No, we -- my friend and I have discussed this and this is being jointly proposed. [27] MR. VARESI: Yes, Your Lordship can simply indicate that the exhibits are to be disposed of as outlined in the -- [28] MR. MCGOWAN: Exhibit 2. [29] MR. VARESI: -- Exhibit 2. [30] THE COURT: Let us do that. I will direct that the exhibits be disposed of in accordance with Exhibit 2. [31] MR. VARESI: Yes. [32] MR. MCGOWAN: Yes. Mr. Varesi can then prepare a formal order. [33] THE COURT: Yes. [34] MR. VARESI: Thank you. That's everything,
from the Crown's perspective, My Lord. [35] THE COURT: And do you need anything from me in terms of the stays on the others? [36] MR. VARESI: No, the -- no, it was stayed on the record, so . . . [37] THE COURT: All right. [38] MR. VARESI: Thank you. [39] MR. MCGOWAN: Thank you, My Lord. [40] THE COURT: Thank you. That is it. [41] MR. VARESI: Thank you very much. [42] THE COURT: Thank you. [43] THE CLERK: Order in court. "Hori J."
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.