Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court accepted the joint five‑year federal sentence because, applying Anthony‑Cook, the joint submission was on balance fit and not contrary to the public interest given the offender's extensive record, the aggravating facts of the instant offences, the Gladue report mitigation, and the agreed enhanced credit for pre‑sentence custody.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal for Ontario allowed the sentence appeal in part, reducing a lifetime driving prohibition to ten years and nine months and refusing a work-related carve-out.
The joint submission was accepted as fit after consideration of the agreed facts, aggravating factors (manufacture of restricted firearms and trafficking large quantities of controlled substances, prior drug conviction) and mitigating factors (guilty plea, family support, employment history, dated prior conviction), resulting in sentences of 3 years (Count 1), 4 years (Count 3) and 5 years (Count 4) with Counts 3 and 4 concurrent and consecutive to Count 1 for a global term of eight years, plus ancillary orders including firearms prohibitions, DNA order and forfeiture (with certain third-part…
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed an extension-of-time motion to appeal a sentence fine, finding inordinate delay, no admissible evidence, and no merit.
The joint submission for life with 13 years parole ineligibility is accepted because it falls within the established sentencing range for comparable offences (12–15 years) and appropriately balances the aggravating features (extreme brutality, opportunity to cease, ongoing violent sexual preoccupations, prior convictions) with mitigating factors (Gladue background, genuine remorse, guilty plea, rehabilitation efforts); acceptance does not undermine the administration of justice under Anthony‑Cook.
Source excerpt
The court accepted the joint submission and imposed one day in custody because, on the particular facts, the aggravating nature of the offence was outweighed by significant mitigating and collateral factors: the offender's long custodial sentence in Colorado, the detainer's negative effect on parole (causal connection), lengthy delay and resulting evidentiary issues, the guilty plea, rehabilitation efforts, and the application of the totality principle; the court found these circumstances justified accepting a joint submission that would otherwise appear lenient for a brutal weaponized mansla…
Source excerpt
The court accepted the joint submission and imposed an Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision order reduced from the statutory maximum by one year of remand credit: total six years (three years intensive custodial treatment followed by three years conditional supervision), finding all statutory IRCS criteria in YCJA s.42(7) satisfied, that the joint submission did not offend the public interest, and that a 12-month deduction of pre-sentence custody applied to the custodial portion was proportionate; ancillary orders (DNA collection, lifetime weapons/firearm prohibition, non-communic…
Source excerpt
Sentencing reasons on two sexual assault convictions. The court accepted a joint submission and imposed a global sentence of three years’ imprisonment, with ancillary orders.
The court accepted a joint submission and sentenced Richard Charles Reed to ten years for attempted murder, with firearm prohibitions, DNA and forfeiture orders.
Sentencing decision for reckless firearm discharge. The court accepted a joint submission of 30 months’ jail, 18 months’ probation, and ancillary orders.
Explore more
