Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 327

R. v. T.B.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a conviction for the May 2023 sexual assault, finding no reversible misapprehension of evidence or insufficiency of reasons.

  • Sexual assault
  • Assault
  • Recovered memory
  • Credibility and reliability
  • Misapprehension of evidence
  • Sufficiency of reasons
Read case analysis
Civil 2026 ONCA 297

Riva Plumbing Limited v. Ferrari

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed an appeal over economic tort, fiduciary duty, non-competition and bonus disputes, and upheld costs awards to the respondents.

  • Economic torts
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Non-competition clause
  • Contract interpretation
  • Bonus entitlement
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 NSCA 34

R. v. D.P.

The trial judge's reasons were legally and factually deficient—long on recitation but conclusory on credibility, containing errors, conflations and unaddressed evidentiary issues (including the role of cocaine-related evidence)—such that meaningful appellate review was impossible; accordingly the appeal is allowed and a new trial ordered.

  • Sufficiency of reasons
  • Credibility assessment
  • Admissibility of extrinsic misconduct evidence
  • Prior consistent statements
  • Ineffective assistance of counsel (raised but not decided)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 SCC 11

R. v. Maadani

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal, holding there was no reviewable error in the Court of Appeal’s refusal to admit fresh evidence for lack of cogency.

  • Fresh evidence
  • Cogency test
  • Due diligence
  • Credibility assessment
  • Self-defence
  • New trial
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 262

R. v. Fitzpatrick

Ontario Court of Appeal allowed both appeals in a murder case, holding that improper resemblance evidence, flawed W.(D.) instructions, and an improper closing warranted new trials.

  • Identification evidence
  • Leaney recognition evidence
  • W.(d.) jury instructions
  • Eyewitness identification frailties
  • Misconduct in closing argument
  • Mistrial
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 BCSC 632

R. v. Gresty

The appeal is dismissed because the trial judge properly applied the W.D. credibility framework and his findings—that the appellant intentionally applied force by raising his elbow causing the complainant to be propelled backwards—are supported by the evidence (including the accused's own testimony); there was no reasonable apprehension of bias, no improper reliance on unadvanced theories, no prejudicial disclosure failure, and no ineffective assistance that caused a miscarriage of justice.

  • Assault
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
  • W.d. credibility analysis
  • Disclosure obligations
  • Ineffective assistance of counsel
  • Restitution
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 258

R. v. Allred

The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld Damien Allred’s conviction, finding no reversible error in the trial judge’s refusal to let the in-custody accused sit at counsel table.

  • Placement of in-custody accused
  • Prisoner’s box vs counsel table
  • Presumption of innocence
  • Jury instructions and stigma
  • Courtroom security
  • Visibility and identification
Read case analysis
Family law 2026 YKCA 6

NDH v. HNKB

The Yukon Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a retroactive child support order, upholding the chambers judge’s departure from the presumptive notice date.

  • Retroactive child support
  • Date of retroactivity
  • Disclosure of income
  • Guidelines income calculation
  • Blameworthy conduct
  • Trust for child
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 214

R. v. Nguyen

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from conviction for importing heroin, upholding the trial judge’s credibility findings and rejection of the defence.

  • Importation of drugs
  • Mens rea/knowledge
  • Credibility findings
  • Disclosure/miscarriage of justice
  • New evidence on appeal
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 179

R. v. Singh

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from eight criminal convictions, holding the trial judge properly assessed credibility, religious motive evidence, demeanour, and evidentiary gaps.

  • Credibility assessment
  • Religious belief evidence
  • Motive to fabricate
  • Demeanour
  • Burden of proof
  • Investigative omissions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.