Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court found the respondent wrongfully withheld parenting time, rejected defences under s. 62, and imposed a $2,500 fine plus costs.
The court found repeated breaches of conduct and parenting orders, imposed $100,000 fines for each category, denied legal-fee reimbursement under s. 230, and awarded special costs.
Appeal and cross-appeal from a parenting-time variation were dismissed. The Court found no material error, serious misapprehension, or basis for appellate вмешательство.
Because the relocation was consented to and is in the child's best interests, and because requiring the mother to bear all increased travel would be unsafe, burdensome and punitive, the court ordered that the increased transportation burden be approximately equally shared with specified exchange points; a temporal exception applies where the mother’s relocation was for personal, not employment, reasons.
Source excerpt
The court dismissed a contempt application over parenting time, finding the order ambiguous on Jewish holidays and no intentional withholding or fostering of resistance.
The court dismissed an application to enroll a child in private pre-kindergarten and vary an equal-parenting schedule, but ordered limited financial and trust disclosure.
The court varied an interim parenting order to allow gradual overnight parenting time, but refused out-of-province travel and some other requested changes.
The court dismissed an application to vary an interim parenting schedule, finding the affidavit conflicts too serious for summary relief and leaving the issue for trial.
The court granted limited interim parenting time on an alternating weekday and weekend schedule, refused immediate shared parenting, and declined to appoint a parenting coordinator.
Although both parties contributed to unnecessary prolongation of a matter that should have been brief and the result was one of mixed success, the respondent's position and the parties' relative circumstances, together with assertions that prolonged the proceedings without affecting the outcome, warrant an award of costs in favour of the respondent; accordingly the applicant must pay $10,000.00 in costs to the respondent.
Source excerpt
Explore more
