Children's Aid Society of Cape Breton-Victoria v. R.J.
Given the child’s significant developmental and behavioural impairments, the expert evidence that he requires continuous environment controls and 24/7 supervision, the mother’s limited cognitive capacity, social isolation and inconsistent parenting, and the failure or inadequacy of less intrusive services, the court concluded the circumstances justifying removal are unlikely to change within a reasonable time and that permanent care and custody by the Agency is in the child’s best interests with provision for access.
Source excerpt
- Permanent care and custody
- Best interests of the child
- Temporary care and custody
- Risk assessment
- Parental capacity
- Access/contact