Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure 2013 ONCA 14

Direk v. Kryshtalskyj

The amended statement of claim was properly struck because it contained sweeping conclusory allegations unsupported by material facts and failed to disclose a cause of action; leave to amend was properly refused and the appeal was dismissed.

  • Striking pleadings
  • Failure to disclose cause of action
  • Conclusory allegations
  • Leave to amend
  • Adjournment application
  • Costs award
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2012 BCSC 719

Amezcua v. Norlander

The court ordered particulars of special damages to date and required the plaintiff to deliver the expert reports she intended to rely on at trial.

  • Particulars of special damages
  • Disclosure of expert reports
  • Case planning conference powers
  • Litigation privilege
  • Rule 5-3(1)(k)
  • Special-damages
Read case analysis
Medical malpractice 2010 BCCA 409

Ahmed v. Carrere

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed Mr. Ahmed’s appeal from an order striking his medical negligence-style claim and a later desk dismissal.

  • Striking statement of claim
  • Failure to disclose cause of action
  • Conspiracy pleading
  • Self-represented litigant accommodations
  • Desk/guillotine order
  • Striking-statement-of-claim
Read case analysis
Product liability 2009 BCSC 990

Wyman v. Fammarz S.R.L.

The court largely upheld a product-liability pleading, finding that allegations of knowledge, prior warnings, and failure to warn were material facts. Only paragraph 17 was struck.

  • Rule 19 striking pleadings
  • Duty to warn
  • Particularity of pleadings
  • Scandalous pleadings
  • Knowledge as element of damages
  • Pleading
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2005 FCA 300

Corlac Inc. v. Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems Inc.

The prothonotary applied the correct legal test for motions to strike (the plain and obvious standard); it was not shown beyond doubt that the respondents' claims could not succeed, so the motions to strike were properly dismissed and the appeals must be dismissed with costs.

  • Motions to strike
  • Plain and obvious test
  • Standard of review
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2002 BCCA 52

Hearfield v. Thibeault

The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed a self-represented appellant’s challenge to an order striking his claim for disclosing no reasonable cause of action.

  • Strike out under rule 19(24)
  • Costs assessment
  • Self-represented litigant
  • Civil-procedure
  • Strike-out
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2000 BCSC 90

Chaplin v. Sun Life Assurance

The court dismissed an application to set aside or vary a prior amendment order, holding the proper remedy was appeal and that counsel-agreement issues required formal process.

  • Similar fact evidence
  • Leave to amend
  • Punitive damages
  • Confidentiality waiver
  • Appeal
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Torts [1928] SCR 258

Sentinel-Review Co., Ltd. v. Robinson et al.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that statutory notice before a libel action was a condition precedent, that the notice here was sufficient, and restored the plaintiff’s judgment.

  • Libel
  • Notice before action
  • Condition precedent
  • Sufficiency of notice
  • Pleading requirements
  • Excessive damages / new trial
Read case analysis
Sale of land (1910) 47 SCR 399

Macfarlane v. Davis

Appeal in a land-sale deceit case. The Supreme Court of Canada held that honest belief in a representation defeats deceit and allowed the appeal with costs.

  • Deceit
  • Misrepresentation
  • Honest belief
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Adding new cause of action
  • Pleadings-amendment
Read case analysis
Shipping (1892) 21 SCR 359

Vaughan v. Richardson

The Supreme Court of Canada upheld a guarantee signed by Henry Vaughan, finding valid consideration from delayed enforcement and rejecting an unpleaded misrepresentation defence.

  • Disbursements
  • Freight
  • Bill of exchange
  • Guarantee
  • Misrepresentation
  • Consideration
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.