Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Adjudicator concluded defendant authorized an unauthorized entry amounting to trespass; evidence did not prove significant actual property damage so only general damages were appropriate; exemplary damages are unavailable in Small Claims Court; awarded maximum general damages of $100 plus court filing fees of $199.35, total $299.35.
Source excerpt
The Adjudicator erred in law by treating the contract claim for survey services as necessarily requiring adjudication of rights in rem under s.10(a); the primary issue is whether a debt is owing under the contract, which falls within Small Claims jurisdiction, so the Adjudicator’s decision is set aside and the matter remitted for adjudication.
Source excerpt
The application for an extension of time is dismissed because the proposed appeal is jurisdictionally barred under the Small Claims Act s.13(2) and the Court of Appeal Act s.13(3), and therefore the proposed appeal lacks merit and is bound to fail; absence of jurisdiction is dispositive of the extension request.
Source excerpt
The court accepted the defendant's express consent that $3,000 was due, disallowed unsupported estimates for additional sums, applied s.11 to award maximum general damages of $100, awarded interest on the $3,100 at 4% from May 20, 2024, and allowed the filing fee, resulting in a judgment of $3,504.71.
Source excerpt
The Adjudicator accepted the landlord acted in good faith under s.10(8)(f)(i) and, applying the factors in Gallant v. Brigley, concluded the landlord's urgent need for a safe, habitable residence justified varying the Director's order to an earlier termination date of October 15, 2025; the tenant's request for a later date was outweighed by the proven need of the landlord.
Source excerpt
The appeal is allowed because the Director's decision was set aside: the Landlord's application was filed outside the mandatory one-year period in s.13 of the Residential Tenancies Act as the second fixed-term lease terminated no later than October 2, 2023 (and alternatively on August 31, 2023), and the Landlord failed to prove that most claimed items arose within the second lease period, so the application must be dismissed as time-barred.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court of British Columbia refused summary dismissal of a small claims appeal and extended time for late service of the notice of hearing.
Claim dismissed because the claimant failed to prove that the defendant's goats were the direct cause of the plant damage and failed to establish negligence by the defendant in controlling the goats; claimant also did not prove specific quantifiable losses required to exceed the statutory general damages limit.
Source excerpt
Because s.12A mandates filing and service of a security deposit claim within ten days of tenancy termination and the landlord did not file or serve the required notice within that period (the October 6 materials were late), the Director’s order requiring return of the $1500 security deposit was correctly made and must be confirmed; the Officer’s email did not grant an extension and the legislation permits no such extension.
Source excerpt
The appeal is dismissed because the Supreme Court found no error of law or denial of natural justice: the adjudicator's findings that the tree remained the landowner's property and that the Respondent had the owner's permission were supported by the evidence; service and pre-trial disclosure were adequate; the Appellant had opportunity to give evidence and to refresh his memory with notes, and witness disclosure was not ambush.
Source excerpt
Explore more
