Peterson v. Anderson
On the facts, no novel duty of care was imposed on the social host: the harm (battery by an autonomous guest) was not reasonably foreseeable to the host and the party did not present an inherent and obvious risk; the Occupiers' Liability Act did not impose liability for the intentional tort of a third-party guest under these circumstances; Ashton Anderson was liable both for intentional battery and in negligence for kicking/pushing the plaintiff down the stairs, and the host Sydney Kenney was not liable for AA’s actions.
Source excerpt
- Duty of care
- Foreseeability
- Proximity
- Anns/cooper test
- Occupiers' liability act s.2-5
- Battery