Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort 2025 NSSC 186

Peterson v. Anderson

On the facts, no novel duty of care was imposed on the social host: the harm (battery by an autonomous guest) was not reasonably foreseeable to the host and the party did not present an inherent and obvious risk; the Occupiers' Liability Act did not impose liability for the intentional tort of a third-party guest under these circumstances; Ashton Anderson was liable both for intentional battery and in negligence for kicking/pushing the plaintiff down the stairs, and the host Sydney Kenney was not liable for AA’s actions.

  • Duty of care
  • Foreseeability
  • Proximity
  • Anns/cooper test
  • Occupiers' liability act s.2-5
  • Battery
Read case analysis
Occupiers' liability 2022 BCSC 1894

Hartling v. Pitman

The court granted leave to amend the notice of civil claim to add punitive and aggravated damages, finding the proposed amendments were not clearly invalid at law.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Punitive damages
  • Aggravated damages
  • Social host duty
  • Bifurcation
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
Read case analysis
Tort 2022 BCCA 219

McCormickv.Plambeck

Cet appel en responsabilité délictuelle porte sur la responsabilité d’hôtes sociaux envers un mineur blessé après avoir quitté une fête. La Cour rejette l’appel.

  • Foreseeability
  • Duty of care
  • Proximity
  • Anns/cooper test
  • Standard of care
  • Duty-of-care
Read case analysis
Tort 2011 BCSC 1364

Sidhu v. Hiebert

The court refused to dismiss social host negligence claims on summary trial, finding disputed facts required a full trial. It dismissed the companion Braun third-party claim.

  • Duty of care
  • Anns test
  • Proximate causation
  • Nonfeasance
  • Foreseeability
  • Contributory negligence
Read case analysis
Tort 2001 BCSC 297

Prevost v. Vetter et al

The Supreme Court of British Columbia refused to dismiss a negligence claim, finding Gregory and Shari Vetter owed a duty of care and had breached it.

  • Duty of care
  • Breach of standard of care
  • Foreseeability
  • Liability for third-party conduct
  • Duty-of-care
  • Breach-of-standard-of-care
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.