Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a CRA decision denying CRB eligibility, finding the officer’s reasonableness analysis supported by the record.
The Federal Court did not commit a reviewable error in dismissing the application for judicial review for non-compliance with the Federal Courts Rules and court orders because the appellant was put on notice of requirements and deadlines, was granted extensions and warned about non-compliant affidavits, and the dismissal was a permissible exercise of judicial discretion not vitiated by legal or palpable overriding error.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of CRA benefit eligibility decisions, holding the officer reasonably applied statutory income criteria under Vavilov.
The Federal Court dismissed Patrick James’s judicial review of CRA decisions denying CRB, CRSB and CWLB benefits for failing the $5,000 net income test.
The Federal Court dismissed Mr. Haque’s motion challenging CRA counsel’s status and seeking to file new evidence in a CRB judicial review.
The Federal Court found no procedural fairness breach, but held the CRA’s refusal of CRB benefits was unreasonable because its reasons lacked a rational chain of analysis.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of CRA’s refusal of CRB benefits, finding the evidentiary assessment reasonable and procedurally fair.
The appeal is dismissed because the Minister properly exercised his discretion under the Employment Insurance Act; the Minister considered the relevant circumstances, there was sufficient factual material (ROEs, payroll records, inconsistencies, timing of benefit claims, proof of payment issues and the employer‑employee relationship facts) to support his conclusion that a substantially similar arm's‑length contract would not have been made, and the appellant failed to show an improper exercise of discretion.
Source excerpt
The Minister's decision was reasonable and sustainable because the Record of Employment materially overstated insurable earnings relative to payments proved, the evidence did not support that an unrelated arm's-length manager would have accepted the same delayed and partial payment arrangement, and therefore the parties would not have entered into a substantially similar contract at arm's length.
Source excerpt
Explore more
