Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 301

R. v. M.W.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed most of a sentence appeal in a child sexual offence case, set aside one unavailable prohibition order, and admitted fresh Gladue-related evidence.

  • Sentence appeal
  • Double-counting of aggravating factors
  • Gladue principles
  • Section 161(1) prohibition
  • Section 109(3) lifetime weapons prohibition
  • Admission of fresh evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 NSPC 42

R. v. Eisener

Balancing significant aggravating factors (commission while on statutory release, extensive and escalating criminal record, need for specific deterrence) against mitigating facts (brief confinement under one minute, no weapon, no physical injury, not a planned hijacking and mid-to-low moral blameworthiness), the appropriate individual sentences are 12 months for unlawful confinement and 60 days concurrent for resisting arrest; applying enhanced remand credit of 224 days (121 days remand credited at 1.5:1 plus accounting adjustments) yields 141 days remaining to be served; lifetime weapons pro…

  • Unlawful confinement
  • Resisting or obstructing a peace officer
  • Sentencing principles (proportionality, totality)
  • Enhanced remand credit (carvery)
  • Section 109 weapons prohibition
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCSC 2520

R. v. Toenders

Sentencing reasons in a sexual assault case: 45 months’ total imprisonment, with ancillary orders including a lifetime weapons ban, DNA order, probation, and sex-offender registry registration.

  • Denunciation
  • General and specific deterrence
  • Rehabilitation
  • Sentence parity
  • No-contact orders
  • Mandatory registration
Read case analysis
Youth criminal justice 2016 NSCA 9

R. v. A.M.

The Youth Criminal Justice Act limits the duration of prohibition orders against young persons to two years (s.51(4)); a five-year weapons prohibition imposed on the appellant exceeded statutory authority and was therefore invalid and must be set aside; because the appellant had already been subject to a weapons prohibition for more than two years, no replacement order was necessary.

  • Duration of weapons prohibition
  • Section 51 ycja
  • Section 110 criminal code
  • Validity of prohibition order
  • Replacement order
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2015 BCSC 1942

R. v. Leobrera

Sentence for producing methamphetamine: three years’ imprisonment, plus weapons prohibition, DNA order, forfeiture, and a stay of remaining counts.

  • Production of methamphetamine
  • General deterrence
  • Denunciation
  • Sentencing parity
  • Ancillary orders
  • Stay of proceedings
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2015 NSPC 63

R. v. Wright

The joint submission of five years' imprisonment is accepted as fit and proportionate given the large quantity of cocaine (952g), the offender's prior record and parole status, his early guilty plea and cooperation, and the need for denunciation and deterrence; accordingly the court imposed five years' imprisonment to be served consecutively to any current sentence, plus ancillary orders (victim surcharge, DNA collection specifying cocaine, life weapons prohibition, forfeiture).

  • Trafficking in cocaine
  • Joint sentencing submission
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Proportionality and parity
  • Ancillary search powers
  • Dna collection orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2013 NSPC 121

R. v. Jamieson

The joint submission was within the permissible range and was accepted; remand credit was declined because the accused had been on bail for related matters; aggravating factors (violent robberies, targeting an ATM user, significant victim impact and commission while on bail) warranted a strongly denunciatory sentence but the accused's age required preservation of rehabilitation prospects, resulting in a five-year global sentence comprised of a four-year sentence for the Connors robbery with a consecutive one-year sentence for the MacKinnon robbery, concurrent short sentences on remaining coun…

  • Guilty plea mitigation
  • Joint sentence submission
  • Remand credit
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Victim impact
  • No-contact endorsement
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2013 NSSC 136

R. v. Laffin

The appropriate sentence is determined by established sentencing principles and comparative case law and must be imposed concurrent to the existing life sentence; the Crown's proposed 12 years exceeded the comparable range for the offences pleaded and the Court imposed concurrent sentences resulting in a nine-year federal sentence on a go-forward basis with limited remand credit and ancillary orders.

  • Concurrent sentencing
  • Remand credit
  • Victim fine surcharge
  • Dna order
  • Parole eligibility
  • Denunciation and deterrence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2012 NSSC 223

R. v. Horan

Given the seriousness of the controlled drug offences, the offender's record and breach of court order, and the need for denunciation and deterrence, the court accepted the joint recommendation and imposed a custodial sentence of six months (concurrent on the drug counts, consecutive to existing sentences), a concurrent 30‑day sentence on the breach, followed by two years probation with strict conditions and a ten‑year firearms prohibition plus a lifetime prohibition on restricted weapons.

  • Controlled drugs and substances act offences
  • Breach of court order
  • Joint recommendation on sentence
  • Denunciation and deterrence
  • Probation conditions and testing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2011 ONCA 733

R. v. Suntok

The appellate court concluded that, given the seriousness of the offence, a ten-year prohibition under s.110 was appropriate and that the lifetime ban under s.109 should be struck; accordingly the lifetime s.110 prohibition was varied to ten years and the appeal was allowed.

  • Firearm prohibition
  • Section 109
  • Section 110
  • Joint submission
  • Sentence variation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.