Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Court of Appeal upholds dismissal of claims against the Kauras and R.K.S., leaves the overservice claim against Caesars to proceed, and dismisses both appeal and cross-appeal.
The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the operation and finances of the Sharon Gun Club, holding the claims were barred by a release, limitation period, and lack of standing.
The ANOCC is overly verbose and improperly pleads evidence, rendering it embarrassing or scandalous under R.9-5(1)(b) and (c); however, because the attribution principle articulated in Scott v. Golden Oaks introduces context‑dependent discretion as to imputing a directing mind's knowledge to a corporation, it is not plain and obvious that H6's claims are statute‑barred and therefore those claims cannot be dismissed under R.9-5(1)(a); the appropriate remedy is to stay the action and require the plaintiffs (Mr. Humphrey and H6) to file a further amended notice of civil claim that complies with…
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal concluded the motion judge misapprehended the record and erred in law in applying promissory estoppel (failed to require intent to affect legal relations and misapplied facts); set aside the motion judge’s promissory estoppel finding; directed that whether the FPA limitation bars the petitioner’s claim (including related questions of agreement and statutory extension) be determined at trial; held the appeal is not moot because the reference proceeded subject to the outcome of this appeal.
Source excerpt
Court found no enforceable pre‑existing agreement that Alexander's 2017 allocation would be satisfied by Cherry Street proceeds; despite informal profit sharing, the Trust allocated at least $628,767.50 to Alexander in August 2017 which remained unpaid; Limitation Act discovery occurred in August 2022/February 2023 so claim filed November 2023 was timely; tax paid on Alexander's behalf does not reduce the claimed allocation as pleaded; punitive damages and tracing were not justified; judgment entered for plaintiff for $628,767.50 against trustee/defendant Lyle Holman.
Source excerpt
No trust was proven to show the son was the beneficial owner from 2013; the May 2021 transfer occurred when multiple claims against the transferor were pending, conveyed the transferor's sole significant real asset for nominal consideration to a close family member, giving rise to badges of fraud and a presumption of intent which the defendants failed to rebut; the claim was timely because judgment in the underlying action was obtained on February 12, 2024 and this action was commenced within the limitation period, therefore the transfer is void as against creditors.
Source excerpt
On the undisputed facts the plaintiff knew or ought reasonably to have known by October 2017 that the consequential losses were sufficiently serious to warrant legal proceedings; Kohltech's warranty repairs and assurances did not extend to the consequential damages nor tolled the limitation period, and there was no statutory acknowledgement or waiver restarting the period; accordingly negligence claims for acts or omissions prior to June 2, 2020 are time-barred and must be dismissed.
Source excerpt
The court allowed a partial amendment to the notice of civil claim, struck a proposed assault allegation, and sent limitation issues to trial.
The court struck and dismissed Battista D'Angola’s petition against Fraser Health Authority as prolix, vexatious, an abuse of process, and statute-barred.
The court held the stay-lift application under s. 69.4 BIA was premature because limitation issues meant 105 LP was not yet shown to be a creditor.
Explore more
