Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tax Court struck specified paragraphs of the Amended Notice of Appeal, holding they alleged CRA misconduct, Charter breaches, and relief outside its jurisdiction.
The Tax Court struck Ordia Kelly’s GLGI reassessment appeals without leave to amend and awarded costs to the Crown, finding no new facts or arguments to overcome the donative intent issue.
The Tax Court struck Brenda Rees’s appeals of reassessments for 2005 to 2008 without leave to amend, finding no new facts or arguments to overcome the donative intent issue.
The Tax Court struck John Hassall’s GLGI reassessment appeals without leave to amend, finding no new facts or arguments to overcome the donative intent problem.
The Tax Court struck Peter Wood’s tax appeals without leave to amend, finding no new facts or arguments to overcome the GLGI donative-intent issue.
The Tax Court struck Tina Cassidy’s appeals of 2006 and 2007 reassessments without leave to amend, finding only stale GLGI arguments and awarding costs to the Crown.
The Tax Court struck Joe McLean’s reassessment appeals for 2006 to 2009 without leave to amend and awarded costs to the Crown.
The Tax Court struck Robert P. Warren’s appeals of 2009 and 2010 reassessments without leave to amend, finding no new facts or arguments to overcome the donative intent problem.
The Tax Court bifurcated Denning’s 2006 appeal into GLGI and Royal Crown Gold proceedings and struck the GLGI portion without leave to amend.
The Receivership Funds Agreement did not substantially alter the landscape of the Condominium Action because its salient terms (receivership, insurer subrogation and cooperation obligations, and the insurer's undertaking to complete certain remedial work potentially using receiver funds) were already disclosed in the pleadings and correspondence; therefore immediate disclosure was not required and LHR's application for a stay or dismissal as an abuse of process was dismissed.
Source excerpt
Explore more
