Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court largely refused to reopen a passing of accounts, but corrected a few errors and varied the allowed 2023 accounts to $279,660.41.
The court admitted the claimant’s affidavit and mostly allowed retroactive child-related expense claims, including private school, childcare, counselling, and orthodontic costs.
The court passed a committee’s 2023 accounts under the Patients Property Act, reduced several claimed expenses, denied an emergency fund, and fixed compensation at a lower amount.
Supplementary reasons on university child support for Michael, including proportional sharing of listed expenses, RESP use, receipt verification, and twice-yearly payments.
The court held the respondent was technically in breach of a consent order by leaving the matrimonial home off the market, but equity limited the claimant’s relief and denied occupational rent.
In a child support application, the court ordered the father to contribute $450 monthly toward a child’s post-secondary expenses and confirmed guideline support.
Summary trial under the Strata Property Act: hot tub expenses were recoverable as common facilities, but laundry and elevator claims were dismissed.
The Court held that the self-contained domestic establishment consisted only of the top-floor private residence and paragraph 18(12)(b) restrictions did not apply to the business losses; the appellant's 30% personal allocation of property-related expenses was reasonable; motor vehicle expenses were 70% business-related and car rental costs were disallowed; limited travel adjustments were made (allow $1,000 for 2005 Costa Rica and allow 2006 Berlin travel of about $2,000); Costco and BCAA fees and 2006 appraisal costs were allowable at 70%; other business expenses claimed should be allowed; th…
Source excerpt
The Federal Court held that the Canadian Wheat Board could allocate disputed expenses to pool accounts under the Act and dismissed the judicial review with costs.
Where the residence is the taxpayer's principal and only place of business and significant areas (notably the basement) are used almost exclusively for business, a reasonable allocation of household expenses to business use is 40%; appeals allowing deductions and input tax credits and referring reassessments back to the Minister follow.
Source excerpt
Explore more
