Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law 2026 FC 587

Verma v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court upheld CRA’s CERB ineligibility decision against Jason Verma, finding the review procedurally fair and reasonable and dismissing judicial review.

  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Employment insurance
  • Procedural fairness
  • Reasonableness review
  • Admissibility of new evidence
  • Cerb
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 483

Visagie v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review of a CERB ineligibility decision was granted because the CRA agent failed to meaningfully address the applicant's central COVID-19 disruption evidence.

  • Judicial review
  • Reasonableness standard
  • Procedural fairness
  • Benefit eligibility
  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 427

Hache v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of CRA’s refusal to conduct a second review of COVID-19 benefit eligibility, finding the timeliness decision reasonable and procedurally fair.

  • Judicial review
  • Reasonableness review
  • Procedural fairness
  • Extension of time
  • Canada recovery caregiving benefit
  • Canada emergency response benefit
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 326

Rosenberger v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CRA decision finding Ms. Rosenberger ineligible for CRB and CERB for failing to prove $5,000 in eligible income.

  • Canada recovery benefits
  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Eligibility
  • Judicial review
  • Reasonableness
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 177

Mukta v. Canada (Attorney General)

Federal Court dismissed judicial review of CERB redetermination, finding the officer reasonably applied the $1,000 income threshold and that procedural fairness was met.

  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Eligibility
  • Procedural fairness
  • Reasonableness review
  • Income threshold
  • Nominal income regulations
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2026 FC 147

Herrera v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a CERB eligibility denial, finding the CRA officer’s decision reasonable and procedurally fair.

  • Procedural fairness
  • Reasonableness review
  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Admission of fresh evidence (rule 312)
  • Procedural-fairness
  • Reasonableness-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2025 FC 936

Kawasaki v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review of CERB ineligibility dismissed. The Court found the second review reasonable and fair, and amended the style of cause to name Canada.

  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Eligibility criteria
  • Procedural fairness
  • Standard of review
  • Evidentiary record on judicial review
  • Cerb
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2025 FC 489

Nasroullah v. Canada (Revenue Agency)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of CRA decisions denying CERB and CRB, holding the applicant had not proven the $5,000 income threshold or COVID-related cessation of work.

  • Eligibility
  • Reasonableness
  • Judicial review
  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Canada recovery benefit
  • Onus of proof
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2025 FC 421

Phipps v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review of CERB and CRB ineligibility decisions was dismissed. The Court found the Officer’s reasons reasonable and the process procedurally fair.

  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Canada recovery benefit
  • Eligibility criteria
  • Reasonableness standard
  • New evidence admissibility
  • Settlement privilege
Read case analysis
Administrative law 2025 FC 295

Naqvi v. Canada (Attorney General)

Judicial review of a CRA validation decision on CERB and CRB eligibility was dismissed. The Court found the income evidence insufficient and the process fair.

  • Canada emergency response benefit
  • Canada recovery benefit
  • Eligibility
  • Validation review
  • Reasonableness review
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.