Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law 2025 BCSC 2134

I.A.M.M. v. H.F.S.S.

On costs after a family trial, the Court found the claimant substantially successful and awarded costs at Scale B, payable monthly over 24 months.

  • Divorce
  • Parenting arrangements
  • Travel authorization
  • Income imputation
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Spousal support
Read case analysis
Family law 2025 BCSC 2059

A.S.M v. J.W.M.

The court held the parties formed a binding family settlement and refused to set it aside for alleged non-disclosure, duress, or unconscionability.

  • Settlement agreement enforcement
  • Financial disclosure / non-disclosure
  • Dissipation of assets
  • Spousal support
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Duress
Read case analysis
Family law 2025 BCSC 577

R.C.T. v. A.K.T.

The court awarded the respondent double costs on her successful family-law application, finding her settlement offer reasonable and the claimant non-compliant with prior orders.

  • Costs
  • Double costs
  • Enforcement of orders
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Family-law-costs
  • Double-costs
Read case analysis
Family law 2024 BCSC 1882

Bacso v. Vorobyova

The court ordered a phased increase in parenting time, dismissed a section 91 restraining order, fixed interim support, and made targeted disclosure orders.

  • Parenting time
  • Spousal support entitlement and quantum
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Section 91 asset restraining order
  • Disclosure/production
  • Interim relief
Read case analysis
Family law 2023 BCSC 269

G.E.I. v. C.G.B.

Family law reasons on guardianship, relocation, parenting time, family violence, and Hague Convention history. The court reviews credibility and the child’s best interests.

  • Termination of guardianship
  • Relocation/move application
  • Habitual residence
  • Parenting time and decision-making allocation
  • Supervised contact and abduction risk mitigation
  • Passport and identity-document surrender
Read case analysis
Family law 2020 BCSC 1742

A.E.P. v. M.K.

The court found several breaches of family-law conduct and consent orders, imposed $20,000 in fines, ordered reimbursement of proven s. 7 expenses, and granted further compliance relief.

  • Conduct orders
  • S.228 fines and s.230 enforcement
  • Security for compliance
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Property and rental income
  • Disclosure and production
Read case analysis
Family law 2020 BCSC 3

C.M. v. N.L.

Family law trial on parenting, child protection, support, and property division. The court ended supervised access, ordered joint guardianship, and rejected the respondent’s late expert evidence.

  • Guardianship and parenting arrangements
  • Supervised access
  • Section 211 forensic assessment
  • Excluded property and tracing
  • Valuation of business (dental practice)
  • Joint expert rule and expert admissibility
Read case analysis
Family law 2013 BCSC 310

Cain v. Hodgson

Post-trial family application settling the final order, clarifying parenting time, and deciding costs, double costs, bankruptcy survival of child-support costs, and a parenting coordinator.

  • Parenting time/residence
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Costs and offers to settle (double costs)
  • Parenting coordinator/arbitration
  • Security of costs and bankruptcy
  • Leave to commence proceedings
Read case analysis
Family law 2012 BCSC 394

Fauteux v. Eng

The court enforced a binding separation agreement and allocated disputed family debts and property, including a trailer, timeshare, Vancity debt, and a truck loan.

  • Separation agreement
  • Division of property
  • Liability for debts
  • Enforcement of judgment
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Separation-agreement
Read case analysis
Family law 2010 BCSC 316

R.S.G. v. S.G.

Supplementary reasons in a family-law trial granted divorce and a name change, denied double costs, and awarded 50% of ordinary costs on weekly access.

  • Access schedule (alternating weeks)
  • Child support and s.7 expenses
  • Offer to settle and double costs (rule 37b)
  • Costs following the event (rule 57)
  • Name change application
  • Family-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.