Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2024 BCCA 355

R. v. Chartrand

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal from a sexual assault conviction, finding material errors in the judge’s use of Browne v. Dunn and a misapprehension of evidence.

  • Browne v. dunn rule
  • Misapprehension of evidence
  • Credibility assessment
  • Crown concession
  • Publication ban s.486.4
  • New trial
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 ONCA 794

R. v. Peters

Because the convictions depended almost exclusively on inadmissible evidence and the Crown conceded the verdicts were unreasonable, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the convictions and entered acquittals.

  • Unreasonable verdict
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Crown concession
  • Acquittal on appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2017 BCCA 452

R. v. Vu

The Court of Appeal granted leave and allowed an unopposed sentence appeal, reducing the sentence by 38 days to correct an arithmetic error in pre-trial custody credit.

  • Pre-trial custody credit
  • Sentence calculation error
  • Crown concession
  • Publication ban
  • Criminal-law
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2007 ONCA 540

R. v. Lloyd

The court accepted the Crown's concession as proper and correct and allowed the appeal, quashing the conviction and ordering a new trial.

  • Conviction quashed
  • New trial ordered
  • Crown concession
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2005 BCCA 149

R. v. J.C.H.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal from a robbery conviction after the Crown conceded the evidence could not support guilt, and entered an acquittal.

  • Unreasonable verdict
  • Acquittal
  • Crown concession
  • Extension of time to file notice of appeal
  • Criminal-law
  • Appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law C40016

R. v. Parker

Because the Crown conceded the appeal must be allowed, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and entered an acquittal.

  • Appeal
  • Acquittal
  • Conviction set aside
  • Crown concession
Read case analysis
Criminal law C39332

R. v. Bartlett

The admission of the challenged evidence was erroneous but was harmless because it did not cause any substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice; accordingly the conviction stands; there was no error in principle in the sentence and the sentence appeal is dismissed (leave granted).

  • Admission of evidence
  • Harmless error / miscarriage of justice
  • Sentence review
  • Crown concession
Read case analysis
Criminal law 1997 NSCA 170

R. v. Nickerson

Because the Crown conceded that the conviction was wrongful under the Regulations made pursuant to s.86(3)(a) of the Criminal Code, the Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction.

  • Conviction set aside
  • Regulations under s.86(3)(a) of the criminal code
  • Crown concession
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.