Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 262

R. v. Fitzpatrick

Ontario Court of Appeal allowed both appeals in a murder case, holding that improper resemblance evidence, flawed W.(D.) instructions, and an improper closing warranted new trials.

  • Identification evidence
  • Leaney recognition evidence
  • W.(d.) jury instructions
  • Eyewitness identification frailties
  • Misconduct in closing argument
  • Mistrial
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 BCSC 586

R. v. Obatusa

On the totality of interlocking circumstantial evidence — DNA from the accused on restraint items central to the crime, phone metadata and images showing detailed reconnaissance and contemporaneous photographs of the victim, surveillance consistent with the accused's appearance and gait, and reliable eyewitness accounts — the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused planned, directed and participated in the home invasion and kidnapping; hypothetical prior‑touch explanations were speculative and unreasonable in context.

  • Breaking and entering
  • Kidnapping
  • Parties to an offence (aiding and abetting)
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Identification evidence
  • Dna evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 BCSC 430

R. v. Frenchy

The court admitted complainant evidence about long-standing lesbian identity and no other sexual contact with the accused, finding its probative value outweighed prejudice under Kinamore.

  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Sexual history evidence
  • Kinamore screening
  • Consent
  • Dna evidence
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 147

R. v. M.L.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a sexual-assault conviction, holding that no W.(D.) instruction was required on the evidence at issue.

  • Sexual assault
  • Credibility and burden of proof
  • W.(d.) instruction
  • Toxicology evidence
  • Dna evidence
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 NSPC 3

R. v. Mehaney

The judge accepted the complainant’s account and objective medical and forensic evidence (Traumagram, physician findings, and a DNA match) as credible and probative; the complainant withdrew consent repeatedly during the sexual encounter and suffered injuries and petechiae consistent with choking; the accused’s denials were inconsistent with the medical record and not believed, and the Crown therefore proved beyond a reasonable doubt both sexual assault causing bodily harm and that the accused choked/strangled the complainant.

  • Sexual assault
  • Choking/strangulation
  • Consent
  • Bodily harm
  • Dna evidence
  • Credibility assessment
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 18

R. v. C.L.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal from sexual assault convictions, finding no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge’s credibility and evidence analysis.

  • Credibility
  • Appeal standards
  • Trial reasons
  • Post-offence conduct
  • Dna evidence
  • Improper cross-examination
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 812

R. v. Rees

The Court of Appeal for Ontario quashed Timothy Rees’s conviction after finding the undisclosed Raymer tape caused a miscarriage of justice, but ordered a new trial.

  • Disclosure
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Confession voluntariness
  • Fresh evidence
  • Remedy (acquittal/stay/new trial)
  • Ministerial referral
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2353

R. v. Christensen

Sentencing for second-degree murder: life imprisonment with 13.5 years parole ineligibility, plus DNA, firearms prohibition and forfeiture orders.

  • Second-degree murder
  • Parole ineligibility
  • Gladue factors
  • Victim impact
  • Dna evidence
  • Second-degree-murder
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2045

R. v. Lernowich

The Supreme Court of British Columbia acquitted Jarrett Joseph Lernowich of sexual assault, finding the Crown failed to prove the actus reus beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Actus reus
  • Mens rea
  • Consent
  • Dna evidence
  • Expert evidence
  • Admissibility of sexual history
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCCA 380

R. v. De Paz

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia dismissed Brian De Paz’s bail pending appeal application after finding the appeal grounds very weak and the public interest against release.

  • Bail pending appeal
  • Public interest (enforceability vs reviewability)
  • No-evidence motion
  • Identification evidence
  • Dna evidence
  • Drugging allegation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.