Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 279

R. v. Nowack

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed Steven Nowack’s motion for production of redacted email material sought during his criminal appeal.

  • Disclosure on appeal
  • Fresh evidence
  • Solicitor-client privilege
  • Abuse of process
  • Production under s. 683(1)(a)
  • Trotta test
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2016 NSCA 65

R. v. Martin

Motion dismissed because appellant failed to establish that production was in the interests of justice: most requests had been previously refused in provincial court and not appealed, the appellate issue was narrow and could be decided without the materials, and any further production could be pursued at a new trial if the appeal fails.

  • Disclosure on appeal
  • Fresh evidence
  • Admissibility of audit evidence
  • Standard of review
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2010 ONCA 11

R. v. Singh

Motion dismissed because the appellant failed to establish an air of reality or a nexus between alleged interpreter accreditation/systemic issues and the trial, provided no affidavit evidence, and thus failed the Trotta/PALMER requirements to show a reasonable possibility that the requested production would assist an application to adduce fresh evidence on appeal.

  • Interpreter services
  • Fresh evidence on appeal
  • Disclosure on appeal
  • Charter s.14 (language rights)
  • Accreditation of interpreters
  • Miscarriage of justice
Read case analysis
Criminal law C43448, M33090

R. v. McNeil

On appellate disclosure motions involving third‑party privacy claims the Trotta relevancy threshold applies first; certain Provincial Crown and Barrie Police Service records that may assist in developing admissible fresh evidence about the arresting officer's alleged drug‑related activity and linked misconduct meet that threshold; Provincial Crown records created in the course of criminal investigations are not treated as presumptive employment‑privacy records and must be produced to the prosecutor (subject to redaction and privilege) for selection of relevant portions; an O'Connor‑type proce…

  • Disclosure on appeal
  • Fresh evidence
  • O'connor procedure
  • Trotta test
  • Third‑party privacy
  • Police records
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2006 NSCA 57

R. v. James

The Court declined to order disclosure or production because the Federal Court confidentiality order precluded such relief; however, the Court held that absent that order, material in the provincial Crown's possession and Federal Court-filed materials that would inform the claims and defences in the civil action meet the threshold for disclosure on appeal (some reasonable possibility of assisting the appeal), while RCMP-held material not provided to the investigating police falls outside Crown disclosure and is governed by O'Connor production principles; application dismissed and applicant di…

  • Disclosure on appeal
  • Production of third party records
  • Confidentiality orders
  • Witness protection program act
  • Fresh evidence
  • Crown disclosure obligations on appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2004 BCSC 1661

R. v. Lowther

Application for disclosure on appeal in a municipal parking by-law case was dismissed because the requested material could have been obtained with due diligence at trial.

  • Disclosure on appeal
  • Fresh evidence
  • Due diligence
  • By-law enforcement
  • Right to make full answer and defence
  • Finality of proceedings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.