Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed a motion to add supplementary reply evidence, expedite a leave application, and order mandamus in a pending PR processing judicial review.
The Federal Court fixed costs at 22.5% of Rona’s reasonably incurred costs, awarding Rona $52,625.97 after DHL’s summary judgment motion was dismissed.
Documents that were never provided to or placed on the Tax Court file are not relevant to an appeal challenging the Tax Court's refusal to adjourn and therefore must be excluded from the appeal book; conversely, adjournment request documents that were on the Tax Court file are relevant to the interlocutory decision and must be included; documents proposed by the Crown that pertain to the merits of the tax dispute are irrelevant to the limited procedural fairness issues on appeal and must be excluded.
Source excerpt
Le juge Grammond rejette la demande de Julia Valencia d’agir comme représentante non avocate pour environ 250 enfants, faute de circonstances exceptionnelles et de preuve d’impecuniosité.
The Federal Court assessed the Defendants’ Bill of Costs at $24,788.24, allowed costs slightly above the Tariff B midpoint, and declined to decide judgment interest.
The Federal Court assessed the Defendant’s Bill of Costs at $1,440, allowed 8 units, and refused an extra Item 27 unit after reallocating units to comply with Column III.
The assessment officer has jurisdiction to assess and certify the respondent's Bill of Costs once the Court awarded costs; the Appellant's challenge to the Court's jurisdiction does not negate the enforceability of the Judgment. Applying Rule 407 and Tariff B, the officer allowed 16.5 units ($2,805) for assessable services and disbursements of $288.56 (disallowing a $25.33 courier fee), for a total assessed amount of $3,093.56 payable by the Appellant to the Respondent.
Source excerpt
Assessment of costs in a Federal Court file. The self-represented defendant was allowed $5,491 in part, with several claimed items disallowed or reclassified under Tariff B.
The Federal Court struck Lei Chen’s judicial review as moot after his study permit was approved, and also found the filing an abuse of process.
The Federal Court struck Trinity Global Support Foundation’s judicial review application as non-reviewable, holding the impugned letter was only a response to a demand letter.
Explore more
