Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 201

R. v. Clarke

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from firearms convictions, holding the search warrant challenge failed because the ITO and video evidence were not mischaracterized.

  • Search warrant
  • Garofoli application
  • Mischaracterization of evidence
  • Surveillance video evidence
  • Reasonable grounds
  • Judicial deference
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCSC 2672

R. v. Cancela

The court granted the Crown’s summary dismissal in part, striking a speculative challenge to the existence or status of informants, but let the disclosure request proceed.

  • Search warrant
  • Confidential informant privilege
  • Disclosure (stinchcombe)
  • Summary dismissal (manifestly frivolous)
  • State agent/agent provocateur
  • Garofoli application
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 288

R. v. Grant

Because subsequent related proceedings resulted in concessions and stays demonstrating that the accused could not make full answer and defence due to withheld ITO material, and because that material constitutes fresh evidence affecting the integrity of the criminal process, the appeal must be allowed; the conviction is set aside, a new trial ordered and a stay entered on that new trial.

  • Possession of firearm
  • Search and seizure
  • Informant privilege
  • Disclosure obligations
  • Garofoli application
  • Fresh evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 233

R. v. Bechamp

The appeal was dismissed because the Court agreed with the trial judge that a last-minute offer of earlier trial dates does not convert resulting delay into defence delay and that the case was not sufficiently complex (a Garofoli application and an 11-week schedule did not meet the threshold) to invoke the Jordan exceptional circumstances exception, thereby justifying the stay under s.11(b).

  • S.11(b) delay
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Jordan framework
  • Garofoli application
  • Exceptional circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 ONCA 151

R. v. Vrbanic

Majority: The net delay (after a three‑month COVID deduction) exceeded the 18‑month Jordan ceiling (18 months and 4 days) and the Crown failed to discharge its burden to justify the excess under the particularly complex case exception; the application judge’s factual assessment of complexity and decision to stay proceedings is free of legal error and entitled to deference, so the Crown’s appeal is dismissed.

  • Right to trial within a reasonable time (s.11(b))
  • Unreasonable delay
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Jordan framework
  • Particularly complex case exception
  • Case management
Read case analysis
Criminal 2024 ONCA 448

R. v. Jaser

The Court dismissed the appeal: the trial judge did not err in his pragmatic handling of NSP claims under O'Connor/Garofoli given party consent and preserved options to proceed to Federal Court; the Garofoli step‑five review was correctly applied and entitled to deference; refusal to sever was a reasonable exercise of discretion and did not produce injustice; conspiracy instructions (including Carter steps and repeated cautions) were legally adequate and properly put appellant's feigned‑agreement defence; the isolated out‑of‑court compliment to an undercover agent did not give rise to a reaso…

  • O'connor application
  • Garofoli application
  • National security privilege (cea s.38)
  • Severance of co-accused
  • Conspiracy law and carter hearsay exception
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 ONCA 360

R. v. England

Conviction appeal dismissed because, although the trial judge described the dismissal as summary and did not apply Haevischer, she in substance decided the motion to re-open on the full evidentiary record the defence sought and the outcome would have been the same; sentence appeal dismissed because any error in exceeding a Crown position or misapprehending one prior sentence did not materially affect the fit aggregate sentence given the appellant's high-level commercial trafficking, multiple drugs and a loaded firearm, extensive record, and proper application of totality and sentencing princi…

  • Search warrant validity
  • Garofoli application
  • Summary dismissal
  • Affiant credibility
  • Haevischer standard
  • Totality principle
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2024 BCSC 772

R. v. Saed

The court held no separate leave was needed for a Garofoli application and allowed the accused to proceed, finding the proposed challenge was not manifestly frivolous.

  • Search and seizure
  • Section 8 charter
  • Garofoli application
  • Vukelich threshold
  • Manifestly frivolous summary dismissal
  • Information to obtain (ito)
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 ONCA 530

R. v. Kerr

The trial judge correctly applied the Debot criteria and cautiously assessed the informant's credibility, found the omission of sentencing consideration in the ITO was inadvertent and not so grossly negligent or abusive as to subvert the pre‑authorization process under Paryniuk, and the intercepted communication (or the undercover officer's refreshed testimony) was admissible and sufficient to support convictions; appeal dismissed.

  • Jailhouse informant reliability
  • Warrant validity
  • Intercepted communications
  • Garofoli application
  • Debot credibility test
  • Paryniuk residual discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 ONCA 515

R. v. Pierre

The court upheld the reviewing judge's finding that the confidential informant was credible and that the information was compelling and corroborated; such factual and credibility findings are entitled to appellate deference absent error of law, misapprehension of evidence, or failure to consider relevant evidence, and the Information to Obtain must be assessed as a whole rather than by isolating Debot factors.

  • Confidential informant
  • Information to obtain
  • Garofoli application
  • Debot factors
  • Corroboration
  • Credibility assessment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.