Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law 2026 FC 339

Betru v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a RAD decision confirming state protection in Italy, holding the applicant had not rebutted the presumption with clear evidence.

  • State protection
  • Gender-based violence
  • Intersectionality
  • Standard of review
  • Judicial review
  • Presumption of state protection
Read case analysis
Human rights 2026 CHRT 5

K.L. v. Canada Post Corporation

The Tribunal admitted most of a proposed expert report on domestic and intimate partner violence, but redacted the section on K.L.’s circumstances as improper fact-finding.

  • Domestic and intimate partner violence
  • Accommodation
  • Expert evidence admissibility
  • Intersectionality
  • Shelter sector
  • Public interest remedies
Read case analysis
Human rights 2026 CHRT 3

Ariaratnam v. Canadian Security Intelligence Service

The Tribunal limited the complaint to the 2016 site access clearance, allowed additional discrimination grounds, and excluded pre-2016 allegations as outside scope.

  • Scope of complaint
  • Referral to tribunal
  • Grounds of discrimination
  • Intersectionality
  • Procedural fairness
  • Case management
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2025 FC 1714

Alaraibi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding its assessment of intersectionality, credibility, and future risk was reasonable.

  • Convention refugee
  • Person in need of protection
  • Reasonableness review
  • Intersectionality
  • Credibility assessment
  • Forward-looking risk assessment
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2025 FC 1707

Hardono v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, upholding findings that Manado and Jayapura were viable internal flight alternatives for the applicants.

  • Internal flight alternative
  • Judicial review
  • Judicial notice
  • Intersectionality
  • Standard of review
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2025 FC 1509

Jinaidov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision, finding the RAD’s reasoning reasonable and not required to address an unraised intersectionality argument.

  • Credibility
  • Standard of review — reasonableness
  • Persecution
  • Corruption and extortion
  • Intersectionality
  • Judicial review scope
Read case analysis
Human rights 2025 CHRT 74

Lepine and Lepine (on behalf of A.B.) v. Correctional Service Canada

The Tribunal deferred the respondent’s motion to strike parts of the complaints until after the complainants present evidence in this section 5 CHRA services case.

  • Discrimination in provision of services
  • Duty to accommodate
  • Motions to dismiss/strike
  • Intersectionality
  • Human-rights
  • Discrimination-in-services
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2025 FC 1170

El Skafi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a refugee appeal decision, finding the RAD reasonably assessed cumulative discrimination, intersectionality, and persecution.

  • Judicial review
  • Reasonableness review
  • Cumulative discrimination
  • Persecution
  • Intersectionality
  • Nationality law
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2025 FC 1015

Lakatos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court allowed a judicial review of a PRRA refusal, finding the officer’s state-protection analysis unintelligible and unreasonable.

  • Pre-removal risk assessment
  • State protection
  • Persecution
  • Intersectionality
  • Standard of review
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Human rights 2025 CHRT 32

K.L. v. Canada Post Corporation

The Tribunal dismissed CAEFS’ motion for interested person status, finding it would not add a distinct perspective or useful assistance beyond the existing parties and coalition.

  • Interested person status
  • Intersectionality
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Family status
  • Disability
  • Procedural efficiency
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.