K.S. v. C.W.K.
The trial judge validly exercised discretion under s.65 of the Family Relations Act to refuse enforcement of the Mehr as it would be unfair in light of the respondent's assets, income, and the other financial orders; the appellate court defers to the trial judge absent material error; the proposed fresh evidence was not admitted because it would not have affected the outcome under the Palmer factors.
Source excerpt
- Marriage agreement
- Mehr/dowry enforcement
- Unfairness under family relations act s.65
- Admission of fresh evidence (palmer)
- Standard of appellate review (sattva)