Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a CRA staffing recourse decision, finding the Individual Feedback process fair and the ineligibility ruling reasonable.
The Federal Court declared Alexandre Papouchine a vexatious litigant, stayed his Federal Court proceedings, and imposed a leave requirement, but did not dismiss the underlying judicial review.
The Tribunal dismissed Mr. Benji’s motion to amend his Statement of Particulars, finding the addendum allegations lacked a nexus to the Commission’s referral.
On the balance of probabilities the Appellant’s repeated conduct (frequent abusive communications, videotaping and following others, unsubstantiated peace bond applications, and a threatening incident on April 14, 2024) breached the statutory condition of good behaviour; the landlord’s early conduct by the superintendent was annoying and intrusive but did not, in context and on the evidence, constitute a breach of the landlord’s statutory duties or proof of deliberate use of noxious chemicals; therefore the Director’s order for vacant possession is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The landlord failed to prove an ongoing safety risk justifying termination because the incident was found to be a likely one-off episode attributable to the occupant's disabilities, the tenant has a long, highly subsidized tenancy, the landlord had not fairly applied or communicated a rigid zero-tolerance policy, and the duty to accommodate outweighed termination; therefore the Director's dismissal was upheld.
Source excerpt
The court set aside an RTB decision refusing an extension of time, finding it patently unreasonable because it ignored the petitioner’s serious mental health evidence.
The Federal Court found the CRA’s refusal of CERB, CRB and CWLB benefits procedurally unfair because it failed to properly address disability-related accommodation requests and representations.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for interlocutory leave to the Supreme Court of Canada, appointment of counsel, and Charter-based relief.
The court dismissed the application for judicial review, holding the Commission's dismissal of the complaint as 'without merit' fell within a range of reasonable outcomes; the HRO's investigation and report did not contain flaws so fundamental as to vitiate the Commission's decision and the applicant did not establish reviewable error warranting intervention.
Source excerpt
Appeal dismissed in a child-schooling dispute. The Court upheld the order that the child remain at Thunderbird, rejected fresh evidence, and found the father’s disability had been accommodated.
Explore more
