Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law 2026 ONCA 105

R. v. Wallace

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed Jason Wallace’s sentence appeal, holding the 12-month custodial term fit despite the jump principle argument.

  • Breach of court order
  • Prevention of and remedies for human trafficking act orders
  • Jump principle
  • Specific deterrence
  • Probation
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 NSSC 326

R. v. Kelley

Given the offender’s significant prior record, the facts (loaded restricted firearm with obliterated serial number and ammunition in a rental vehicle while under a prohibition not to drive), and sentencing principles of denunciation, deterrence and separation, the court imposed 2.5 years custody for s.95, a consecutive 1 year custody for s.117.01(3)(a), and 45 days concurrent for s.145; remand of 706 days was credited at 1.5:1 to 1059 days producing a remaining custodial balance of 219 days; ancillary orders of 24 months probation with reporting and counselling, lifetime firearm prohibition u…

  • Possession of restricted firearm
  • Possession while prohibited
  • Breach of court order
  • Remand credit
  • Probation and ancillary orders
  • Forfeiture
Read case analysis
Family law 2025 BCSC 1403

N.M. v. G.L.

The court continued a protection order, found evidence of coercive and abusive conduct, and granted limited supervised parenting time with communication exceptions.

  • Protection order
  • Parenting time
  • Supervised access
  • Coercive and controlling behaviour
  • Breach of court order
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Family law 2025 BCSC 279

A.T. v. M.E.V.

Interim family law decision on relocation, parenting time, and breach of order. The court allowed the children to remain in Winnipeg pending trial, imposed a $5,000 penalty, and kept supervised contact.

  • Relocation
  • Parenting time
  • Supervised parenting
  • Best interests of the child
  • Reunification counselling
  • Breach of court order
Read case analysis
Family law 2024 BCSC 566

H.S. v. S.K.

The court found the respondent breached a notice order by taking the child to India without required notice. It varied earlier terms, imposed a $500 fine, and addressed counselling and costs.

  • Parenting arrangements
  • Breach of court order
  • International travel with child
  • Passport custody
  • Reintegrative counselling
  • Costs and fines
Read case analysis
Civil 2024 ONCA 57

Buduchnist Credit Union Limited v. 2321197 Ontario Inc.

Where a creditor's claim arises solely from its breach of a clear Mareva injunction the court has broad equitable jurisdiction to refuse, delay or condition enforcement of that claim; applying that principle, the Court of Appeal found BCU breached the Mareva order and ordered enforcement of amounts advanced in breach delayed until Trade Capital's action is determined, with pari passu recovery if Trade Capital succeeds.

  • Mareva injunction
  • Breach of court order
  • Abuse of process
  • Creditor priority
  • Distribution order
  • Variation of injunction
Read case analysis
Family law 2023 BCSC 1414

K.L.M v. L.K.M.

The court refused special costs, awarded Appendix B costs to the mother, dismissed the father’s application, and imposed a $5,000 FLA fine for repeated breaches.

  • Parenting arrangements
  • Breach of court order
  • Special costs
  • S.230 fines
  • S.211 report
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law 2023 BCSC 1073

F.A.P. v. L.F.T.

The court allowed the respondent to relocate with the child to Victoria, kept the parents as joint guardians, ordered long-distance parenting time, and made child and spousal support awards.

  • Relocation
  • Primary parenting
  • Best interests of the child
  • Breach of court order
  • Expert evidence admissibility
  • Parenting time
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 BCCA 403

R. v. Fox

The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr. Fox’s application for leave to cross-examine trial Crown counsel, finding no reasonable possibility the evidence would assist the appeal.

  • Leave to cross-examine under s.683(1)(b) criminal code
  • Disclosure
  • Abuse of process
  • Credibility of counsel
  • Late disclosure
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.