Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Cour suprême de la C.-B. autorise en partie Sun Life à modifier sa contre-demande et ordonne une divulgation documentaire ciblée, tout en rejetant la reprise générale des dommages pécuniaires.
The court refused to vary the parties’ consent support order beyond the anticipated 2025 review, upheld attributed incomes, denied arrears cancellation, and ordered enforcement and disclosure.
The court granted a time-limited stay of execution pending an s. 83 hearing, on condition that the applicants pay $100,000 and the plaintiff produce ordered records.
The court dismissed the defendants’ document-production application in a civil forfeiture case, holding the Director lacked possession, power or control over DPD, RCMP and PPSC records.
The Court of Appeal set aside an order striking counterclaim paragraphs tied to a BPCPA s. 172 claim and remitted most document-production issues to the trial court.
The court ordered a Form 22 list of documents but adjourned generally a broader production request for criminal trial materials, leaving the issue to be reset later.
The Tribunal found the Draft DAOD documents are arguably relevant to the CAF’s pleaded BFOR defence and to potential remedies; the public interest in disclosure for a fair adjudication outweighs the CAF’s generalized class claim of public interest immunity; production is ordered subject only to valid claims of solicitor‑client privilege and the CAF must particularize such claims by delivering updated privilege lists.
Source excerpt
The court settled the form of order in a family law proceeding, holding the breach conclusions should be stated as findings and that document production rested on Rule 9-1.
Court held the Monitor’s review was limited by the Consent Order, but ordered production of certain statements, retainer agreements, third-party loan records and payment documents.
The Tribunal held that the documents sought by the complainant and by the Commission are arguably relevant and must be produced subject to redaction of personal identifiers; the respondent must either produce non-privileged documents or file a detailed affidavit within 15 days stating why each requested document does not exist or why privilege applies; failure to file the affidavit results in an order to produce the documents. Selection committee materials are not an adjudicative forum that precludes disclosure; Privacy Act considerations do not bar production if confidentiality is protected…
Source excerpt
Explore more
