Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative-law 2026 FC 581

Olsheski v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court struck a judicial review application as premature, holding the workspace-allocation dispute was grievable under the FPSLRA and that no exceptional circumstances justified bypassing the grievance process.

  • Judicial-review
  • Exhaustion-of-remedies
  • Grievance-procedure
  • Procedural-fairness
  • Motions-to-strike
  • Motion-to-strike
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2026 CF 472

Ashby c. Agence Parcs Canada

La Cour fédérale accueille partiellement le contrôle judiciaire de Mme Ashby, jugeant déraisonnable le refus de la Commission des droits de la personne de statuer sur sa plainte.

  • Judicial-review
  • Tribunal-jurisdiction
  • Exhaustion-of-internal-remedies
  • Harassment-and-discrimination
  • Union-membership/status
  • Exhaustion-of-remedies
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2026 FC 450

Simple Path Farms and Poultry Ltd v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review, holding that the applicant had not exhausted the adequate alternative complaint process before the Farm Products Council.

  • Exhaustion-of-remedies
  • Ultra-vires-challenge
  • Administrative-levies
  • Force-majeure
  • Judicial-review-discretion
  • Agency-supervisory-powers
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2026 FC 415

Cook v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court struck a judicial review application as premature because the applicant still had an available grievance process to exhaust.

  • Prematurity
  • Mootness
  • Abuse-of-process
  • Exhaustion-of-remedies
  • Judicial-review
  • Grievance-procedures
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2026 FC 295

Gladman v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court struck two judicial review applications as premature, holding the applicants had to pursue the FPSLRA grievance process first.

  • Exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies
  • Grievance-procedure
  • Fpslra-s.208
  • Independent-recourse-mechanism
  • Promotions-and-career-progression
  • Prematurity
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2026 CF 186

Gravel c. Canada (Procureur général)

La Cour fédérale accueille une requête en radiation et radie la demande de contrôle judiciaire de Richard Gravel comme prématurée, avec dépens.

  • Prematurity
  • Exhaustion-of-statutory-remedies
  • Procedural-fairness
  • Conditions-of-release
  • Stay/suspension
  • Appeal-procedure
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2026 FC 153

Sahtu Divisional Education Council v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court dismissed appeals challenging strike orders in eight Jordan’s Principle judicial reviews, upheld the finding of prematurity, and refused leave to amend to add mandamus.

  • Jordan's-principle
  • Judicial-review
  • Mandamus
  • Leave-to-amend
  • Exhaustion-of-remedies
  • Interlocutory-relief
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2025 FC 1962

Duska v. Canada

The Federal Court dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal from an order striking his statement of claim without leave to amend and upheld costs against him.

  • Motion-to-strike
  • Exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies
  • Leave-to-amend
  • Costs
  • Admissibility-of-new-evidence-on-appeal
  • Judicial-review-vs-action
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2025 FC 1620

Hogan v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Federal Court struck a judicial review as premature because the applicant had an ongoing reprisal complaint before the Board and no exceptional circumstances were shown.

  • Exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies
  • Abuse-of-process
  • Reprisal-complaint
  • Interim-relief
  • Mandamus
  • Federal-public-sector-labour-relations-act
Read case analysis
Administrative-law 2025 CF 1504

Elmalki c. Canada (Procureur général)

La Cour fédérale radie la demande de contrôle judiciaire comme prématurée, juge que le grief prévu à l’art. 29 de la LDN devait être épuisé, et limite la confidentialité aux seules données médicales.

  • Judicial-review
  • Exhaustion-of-remedies
  • Grievance-process-under-national-defence-act-s.29
  • Confidentiality-and-anonymization
  • Interim-relief-/-injunctions
  • Admissibility-of-affidavits-on-motion-to-strike
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.