Singh v. Director of the Residential Tenancy Branch
The RTB's findings that the rent increase complied with the RTA and tenancy agreement, that the tenant was not entitled to unilaterally withhold rent, and that disputed claims (parking, storage, HVAC, quiet enjoyment, retroactive rent reduction) were not substantiated by evidence supporting entitlements under s.28 or s.65 RTA were reasonable and open to the arbitrator; accordingly the petition for judicial review is dismissed and the landlord is entitled to vacant possession subject to a two‑week stay.
Source excerpt
- Eviction
- Rent increase
- Quiet enjoyment
- Procedural fairness
- Retroactive rent adjustment
- Compensation