Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the operation and finances of the Sharon Gun Club, holding the claims were barred by a release, limitation period, and lack of standing.
To be joined a potential plaintiff must demonstrate an interest in the issues by establishing they were an owner, occupier, or other person interested in the land as of the date of expropriation under the Halifax City Charter 1963; individuals who executed Indentures prior to the expropriation quitclaimed their interests and cannot be joined on that basis, their descendants likewise cannot be joined absent an independent proprietary interest at the expropriation date, minors cannot be joined on the basis of mere residence absent a guardian/trustee holding title or charge/control at the time,…
Source excerpt
The motion judge properly adjudicated the threshold issue under r.21.01(1)(a); the Release contained an illegal clause barring regulatory complaints and was executed as part of an unconscionable transaction, rendering it void and unenforceable; the appellants' procedural objections and complaints about factual findings fail because they framed and participated in the r.21 process and any findings about the broader mortgage scheme do not preclude trial reconsideration.
Source excerpt
Section 129(1) applies only to money owing under a court order; because the dispute was resolved by settlement and no order was made, s.129(1) did not entitle the appellant to post-settlement interest; likewise s.129(4) permits interest only from the date costs are assessed, and the appellant failed to have costs assessed, so no interest on costs was payable.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding the motion judge erred by permitting the factual matrix and economic considerations to override the clear and specific language of the Settlement Documents; the release and minutes of settlement unambiguously discharged all claims, including claims in respect of bonuses, share awards and deferred share plans, and therefore the appellant prevails and the earlier judgment for the respondent is set aside.
Source excerpt
The motion judge did not err: she properly exercised discretion in refusing the adjournment, the unappealed December 2022 order and attached releases legally barred Berg from pursuing the application, and Lake lacked standing as she was not a beneficiary, dependant, or creditor; the proposed fresh evidence was irrelevant and inadmissible and would not have affected the result.
Source excerpt
The release did not extend to the 2009 default judgment because its language did not refer to that action, the release was not ambiguous so contra proferentem did not apply, and the factual matrix (including communications) demonstrated the parties did not intend to release the default judgment; accordingly the motion judge's refusal to set aside the default judgment was upheld.
Source excerpt
The Court dismissed PHSA’s petition to enforce a release, holding the respondent’s disability-related capacity and fairness objections should be decided by the Tribunal.
Applying an objective standard and considering the Notice of Application (including paragraphs 17 and 18) together with settlement communications describing the offer as 'all inclusive' and the parties' acceptance of $24,000 all inclusive, the court implied a term that the parties intended a standard general release covering all causes of action related to the subject-matter of the Application, including claims about the RCMP's failure to investigate; accordingly the Applicant's motion to limit the release was dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed leave to appeal a costs order, holding the proposed appeal raised no question of principle and no arguable merit.
Explore more
