Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court granted judicial review, finding the RAD unreasonably refused the applicant’s sister’s affidavit as new evidence and remitted the matter for redetermination.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a TRV refusal, finding the officer’s assessment of the applicant’s family ties outside Canada was unreasonable and unsupported by the record.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a visitor visa refusal, finding the officer unreasonably assessed financial evidence and failed to grapple with the sponsor’s information.
The Federal Court set aside an immigration officer’s refusal of permanent residence, finding the credibility analysis unreasonable because it relied on unsupported plausibility and ignored material evidence.
The Federal Court set aside a taxpayer relief refusal, finding the delegate unreasonably focused on the date of a lawsuit and failed to engage with its substance.
Federal Court allowed judicial review of a refusal of permanent residence under the self-employed persons class, finding the officer’s reasons unintelligible and unreasonable.
La Cour fédérale accueille le contrôle judiciaire d’un refus d’ERAR, jugeant que l’agent a déguisé des doutes de crédibilité en simple insuffisance de preuve.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a TRV refusal, finding the visa officer failed to address material evidence of the applicant’s ties to Iran.
The trial judge erred by entering an unconditional lump sum for psilocybin-related future care despite expressly conditioning reasonableness on lawful prescription with Health Canada authorization; because the order did not reflect that prerequisite or apply an appropriate negative contingency, the psilocybin portion must be remitted to the trial judge for redetermination.
Source excerpt
Federal Court granted judicial review of an H&C refusal, finding the officer’s best-interests-of-the-child analysis incomplete for failing to address family separation.
Explore more
