Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to vary a chambers order, upheld special costs for abuse of process, and rejected fresh evidence, sealing, and reinstatement relief.
The Federal Court dismissed a motion to stay removal, holding the applicant had not provided admissible evidence to support an extension of time for judicial review.
The court held the stay-lift application under s. 69.4 BIA was premature because limitation issues meant 105 LP was not yet shown to be a creditor.
Leave to appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed in this PPPA/anti-SLAPP dispute over discovery, with the Court directing that the PPPA application be heard first.
The Federal Court held that s 8.2 of the PM(NOC) Regulations does not impose a 45-day limitation period and granted summary judgment dismissing the limitation defence.
The Federal Court dismissed an RCMP officer’s motion for interlocutory mandamus and injunction, finding no enforceable s. 26 duty and no irreparable harm.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an appeal in a PM(NOC) Regulations damages case, upholding findings on the 24-month liability period, generic entry timing, market share, and lost sales.
The Federal Court fixed section 8 damages, awarded prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and directed that costs be assessed with limits on recoverable items.
Federal Court section 8 PMNOC damages reasons in a venlafaxine case, fixing the relevant period, market assumptions, pricing, rebates, and interest.
The Federal Court fixed Apotex’s s. 8 damages period for ramipril at April 26, 2004 to December 12, 2006 and set out the but-for market framework.
Explore more
