Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court granted judicial review after finding a visa officer unreasonably refused study permits and a related TRV by ignoring key evidence and submissions.
Judicial review of a study permit refusal was granted because the IRCC officer’s reasons did not address key evidence or show a discernible reasoning chain.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the officer unreasonably failed to address the applicant’s evidence and push-pull factors.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the visa officer’s reasons lacked the minimum intelligibility required by Vavilov.
Federal Court allowed judicial review of a study-permit refusal, finding the officer’s reasoning unreasonable because doubts about the sponsor relationship may have affected the financial-support assessment.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a second study permit refusal, set the decision aside, and ordered redetermination by a different officer within 45 days.
Federal Court granted leave and judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the officer’s reasons on finances and study progression were unintelligible and lacked transparency.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the officer unreasonably ignored significant financial evidence and misassessed career progression.
The Federal Court dismissed three judicial review applications challenging refusals of work and study permits, holding the officer reasonably assessed the applicants’ evidence and had no duty to contact ESDC or MIFI.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the visa officer reasonably concluded the applicant had not shown she would leave Canada at the end of her stay.
Explore more
