Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Haldar & & Anor v Crook & Ors (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 1091 (KB) (11 May 2026)
The court dismissed applications to restore struck-out claims and for interim payments, held the filings were unintelligible and abusive, and granted a communication injunction.
Both the 2022 and 2024 claims have been struck out by prior orders for non-compliance with unless orders and failure to provide proper particulars of claim; no valid application to reinstate has been made; interim payments cannot be ordered in claims that do not exist.
Source excerpt
The First-Tier Tribunal (Asylum Support) has jurisdiction under section 103 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 to consider whether an asylum claim has been validly treated as withdrawn, as this forms an integral part of the decision to refuse or withdraw support. The statutory scheme does not preclude the Tribunal from examining the foundational reasoning for withdrawal of support, and the right of appeal under section 103(2) applies where support is discontinued following a disputed withdrawal of an asylum claim.
Source excerpt
MTA v The Lord Chancellor [2024] EWCA Civ 965 (13 August 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that a damages claim under the Human Rights Act could proceed without a prior appeal where the impugned orders had already been found to have no effect.
The Court of Appeal held that a damages claim under section 9(3) HRA could proceed without a prior appeal where the relevant orders had already been found to have no effect.
Guled, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 92 (12 February 2019)
The Court of Appeal held that a deportation order made in breach of public law was void ab initio and did not invalidate the appellant’s existing leave to remain.
The High Court refused most of Taylor Hampton’s appeal against refusal to amend its defence and counterclaim, finding the application was a collateral challenge to an earlier order.
Mark Lewis Law Ltd & Anor v Taylor Hampton Solicitors Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2359 (QB) (22 September 2017)
The High Court refused most of Taylor Hampton’s appeal against refusal to amend its defence and counterclaim, finding the proposed changes were a collateral challenge to an earlier order.
Mark Lewis Law Ltd & Anor v Taylor Hampton Solicitors Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2359 (QB) (22 September 2017)
The High Court refused most permission to appeal an amendment ruling, holding the proposed changes were a collateral challenge to an earlier order. Limited permission was granted on two minor points.
Clayton & Anor v R [2014] EWCA Crim 1030 (23 May 2014)
The Court of Appeal held that the appellants could not use abuse of process to challenge an enforcement notice’s validity in breach proceedings.
Explore more
