Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Upper Tribunal allowed AR’s appeal, setting aside First-tier Tribunal decisions for failure to address retained worker status and inadequate reasons.
The Upper Tribunal set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s decision on universal credit eligibility, finding inadequate fact-finding on self-sufficiency and AT destitution.
The Upper Tribunal allowed KS’s appeal, set aside the First-tier Tribunal decision, and remade the case in her favour on qualifying right to reside.
The Upper Tribunal allowed MN’s appeals, set aside two First-tier Tribunal decisions, and remitted the case for a fresh hearing on self-sufficiency and right to reside.
The Upper Tribunal held the First-tier Tribunal erred in law on self-sufficiency and right to reside for universal credit, and remitted the case for a fresh oral hearing.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an anonymised appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal gave inadequate reasons and materially erred in law. The case was remitted.
The Upper Tribunal allowed a Universal Credit appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal gave inadequate reasons and materially erred in law. The case was remitted for a fresh hearing.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal over Universal Credit, holding that the EU national could rely on household resources without legal error on these facts.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Versnick & Anor [2024] EWCA Civ 1454 (29 November 2024)
The Court of Appeal dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal, holding that an EU national could rely on a UK spouse’s benefits in assessing self-sufficiency where the household burden did not increase.
The refusal of Universal Credit to the appellant, a victim of domestic violence with pre-settled status under Appendix EU, was unlawfully discriminatory contrary to Article 14 ECHR, and regulation 9(3)(c)(i) of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 should be disapplied in her case.
Source excerpt
Explore more
