Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal dismissed SJ’s asylum, humanitarian protection and Article 8 appeal, finding he had not shown he was Gambian and was instead a citizen of Guinea.
The appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal found no Convention reason, gave little weight to the Jordanian conviction documents, and held that protection and internal relocation were available.
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed EN’s appeal on asylum, humanitarian protection and human rights grounds, finding no proven political risk, medical Article 3 claim, or Article 8 breach.
The Tribunal allowed an Afghan protection appeal, finding Taliban adverse interest in the appellant’s family and accepting risk arising from his father’s government-linked construction work.
The tribunal allowed a Trinidad and Tobago asylum appeal on humanitarian protection grounds, finding a real risk from Gang 7, no sufficient protection, and no reasonable internal relocation.
The Tribunal dismissed CH’s asylum, humanitarian protection and ECHR appeal, finding him credible and bisexual but able to relocate safely within Namibia.
The Tribunal dismissed a Vietnamese appellant’s protection appeal based on alleged debts to moneylenders, finding no Refugee Convention ground, no credible risk, and sufficient protection.
The tribunal allowed RH’s asylum appeal, finding he had been trafficked into cannabis production and would face persecution in Albania without sufficient protection.
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed AK’s asylum, humanitarian protection, Article 3 and Article 8 appeal, finding internal relocation in India was available.
Permission to proceed with judicial review is granted on grounds that it is arguable the Defendant failed to properly apply or justify departure from binding country guidance on blood feuds in Albania when certifying the claim as clearly unfounded, and that the certification decision unlawfully impacted the lawfulness of detention. It is also arguable that detention after 27 April 2023 breached the Hardial Singh principles.
Source excerpt
Explore more
