Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal allowed the asylum appeal, finding the appellant’s family had repeatedly located her in Nigeria, so internal relocation was not a safe or reasonable option.
The Court of Appeal held that the tribunal gave unclear reasons on core asylum risk issues and the husband’s evidence, so the appeal was allowed and remitted.
AM & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 159 (24 February 2026)
The Court of Appeal allowed an asylum appeal, holding that the tribunal’s credibility reasoning left unclear what it accepted about the key risk facts and D’s evidence.
The Supreme Court held that gay asylum seekers cannot be denied refugee status on the basis that they could avoid persecution by living discreetly.
IH (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 745 (12 June 2008)
The Court of Appeal refused an asylum appeal, holding there was no error of law in findings that the appellant was an economic migrant rather than a refugee.
Court of Appeal dismissed an Afghan asylum appeal by an unaccompanied minor, holding there was no objective basis for a current risk on return.
EB (Ethiopia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 809 (31 July 2007)
Court of Appeal considered whether ethnic deprivation of nationality and removal of identity documents could amount to persecution under the Refugee Convention.
The Court of Appeal granted permission to appeal in an Iranian asylum case, holding that arguable shortcomings in the adjudicator’s reasons on key evidence deserved full review.
Karbaschien v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1430 (21 September 2006)
Permission to appeal was granted in this asylum case because the adjudicator may have failed to explain how key evidence was treated.
Court of Appeal held the Immigration Appeal Tribunal could overturn an adjudicator on asylum risk where the adjudicator failed to consider the full country-evidence backdrop.
Explore more
