Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

R v Luke Caudrey

The Court of Appeal allowed a sentence appeal for cannabis importation, holding the Recorder failed to apply the custodial-sentence guideline and imposing a suspended term instead.

  • Sentencing
  • Drug offences
  • Importation of controlled substances
  • Suspended sentences
  • Mitigation
  • Deterrence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] EWCA Crim 274

Poor, R. v

Poor, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 274 (19 February 2026)

Appeal against a 27-month sentence for violent disorder dismissed. The Court of Appeal held that the appellant’s role in widespread unrest justified the sentence.

  • Violent disorder
  • Sentencing
  • Public order offences
  • Mitigation and aggravation
  • Deterrence
  • Violent-disorder
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] EWCA Crim 164

Caudrey, R. v

Caudrey, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 164 (03 February 2026)

The Court of Appeal held that the sentencing judge erred by failing to address the custody/suspension guideline and substituted a suspended term.

  • Sentencing
  • Drug offences
  • Suspended sentences
  • Mitigation
  • Deterrence
  • Suspended-sentences
Read case analysis
Immigration

Sofian Majera v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

Court of Appeal dismissed a deportation appeal, holding that the Upper Tribunal properly set aside inadequate First-tier Tribunal reasons and correctly applied the very compelling circumstances test.

  • Deportation
  • Article 8 echr
  • Very compelling circumstances test
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Tribunal procedure
  • Rehabilitation
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] EWCA Crim 535

Castle, R. v

Castle, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 535 (10 April 2025)

The Court of Appeal refused to reduce a 26-month sentence for blackmail against a serving MP, holding that the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

  • Blackmail
  • Sentencing
  • Public officials
  • Mitigation
  • Deterrence
  • Sentencing-appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law

R v Robert Aiden Castle

The sentence of 26 months' custody for blackmail targeting a public servant was not manifestly excessive; the judge properly considered aggravating and mitigating factors, and the seriousness of the offence justified an immediate custodial sentence.

  • Blackmail
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigation
  • Deterrence
  • Public servant protection
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Morgan Trowland & Anor v R

Given the high culpability, extensive planning, scale of disruption, previous convictions, and the need for deterrence, the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive or disproportionate. The judge made no material error of principle and properly balanced the appellants' rights with the public interest.

  • Public nuisance
  • Sentencing
  • Protest rights
  • Freedom of expression
  • Freedom of assembly
  • Deterrence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] EWCA Crim 919

Trowland & Anor, R. v

Trowland & Anor, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 919 (31 July 2023)

The Court of Appeal upheld prison sentences for two Just Stop Oil protesters whose bridge protest caused major disruption, holding the terms were not disproportionate.

  • Public nuisance
  • Sentencing
  • Freedom of expression
  • Freedom of assembly
  • Protest law
  • Deterrence
Read case analysis
Administrative law

Lineage UK Transport Ltd

The Upper Tribunal dismissed Lineage UK Transport Ltd’s appeal against curtailment of its operator’s licence, holding the Traffic Commissioner’s sanction was proportionate and not punitive.

  • Operator's licence curtailment
  • Proportionality
  • Regulator’s code
  • Statutory guidance
  • Deterrence
  • Roadworthiness
Read case analysis
Company law [2023] EWHC 182 (Ch)

Falodun v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Re V1CE Ltd & Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986)

Falodun v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Re V1CE Ltd & Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986) [2023] EWHC 182 (Ch) (09 February 2023)

Permission to act as a director was refused because the applicant failed to give full disclosure and did not show the proposed safeguards would adequately protect the public.

  • Director disqualification
  • Permission to act as director
  • Company directors disqualification act 1986
  • Adequate accounting records
  • Non-disclosure
  • Public protection
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.