Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Dacorum Borough Council v Persons Unknown [2026] EWHC 1174 (KB) (18 May 2026)
The High Court continued a planning injunction against persons unknown over unauthorised development on Green Belt land, refusing discharge or variation.
The High Court continued a planning injunction against persons unknown and added named intended defendants, refusing discharge or variation after finding unlawful development and no disclosure breach.
The Commercial Court refused to set aside a second extension of time for serving a claim form, finding sufficient reason for delay and only minor disclosure breaches.
Al-Azzawi v Moustafa [2025] EWHC 1836 (KB) (18 July 2025)
The High Court set aside permission to serve out and several service extensions after finding non-disclosure of a serious foreign limitations issue and no good reason for delay.
The High Court set aside ex parte service-out and extension orders for non-disclosure and lack of good reason, and held it had no jurisdiction over the claim.
The High Court continued an interim injunction restraining Cubefunder from appointing administrators out of court, despite material but non-deliberate disclosure breaches.
Phlo Technologies Ltd v Tallaght Financial Ltd (t/a Cubefunder) [2025] EWHC 1405 (Ch) (16 June 2025)
The High Court continued an interim injunction restraining out-of-court administrator appointment, despite procedural and disclosure breaches, and ordered fortification.
The court lacks jurisdiction under CPR 3.1(2)(p) to order a party to provide a corrective witness statement explaining how errors occurred or were discovered, as no case management purpose or overriding objective justifies such an order once the duty to correct false evidence has been fulfilled.
Source excerpt
A claim for proprietary relief under sections 339 and 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986, where there is a serious issue to be tried, is sufficient to ground a proprietary injunction even if a present proprietary interest is not established. The judge did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion, and the duties of full and frank disclosure and fair presentation were adequately discharged.
Source excerpt
The High Court refused to discharge or vary a restraint order over Linda McCracken’s property, finding a real risk of dissipation if she sold her share below market value.
Explore more
