Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Ghana decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Nyanteh v Brooks Assets Management Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0434/2018) [2025] GHAHC 103 (22 May 2025)
The High Court dismissed an application to amend an entry of judgment after finding the plaintiff had assigned his judgment interest and lacked capacity to apply.
Nyanteh v Brooks Assets Management Limited and Another (CM/RPC/0434/2018) [2025] GHAHC 95 (22 May 2025)
The High Court in Accra refused an application to amend an entry of judgment, holding that the plaintiff had assigned his judgment rights and lacked capacity to proceed.
Digitronix Systems Ltd Vrs Jislah Financial Services Ltd [2022] GHAHC 9 (17 November 2022)
The High Court in Accra dismissed third-party claims in garnishee proceedings and granted a garnishee order absolute over funds in CBG Ltd.
Republic Vrs High Court ,wa and Other [2020] GHASC 65 (25 November 2020)
The High Court, Wa, acted within jurisdiction in granting leave to the interested parties to issue a writ of summons against the Official Liquidator under section 93 of Act 1015; no error was committed to warrant certiorari.
Source excerpt
Riasand Ventures Ltd Vrs Registrar Of Companies and Another [2018] GHASC 48 (18 July 2018)
Supreme Court granted a stay of execution of a winding-up order pending appeal, holding the appeal raised serious questions and could otherwise be rendered nugatory.
Republic Vrs High Court (commercial Division) Sunyani and Another [2016] GHASC 94 (3 November 2016)
The Supreme Court held that the High Court acted within jurisdiction in releasing the attached properties to the official liquidator based on the Interested Party's affidavit and submissions, not suo motu. The winding up of DKM Diamond Microfinance Ltd was valid under the Banking Act, and the applicants, as unsecured creditors, properly obtained leave to proceed. The absence of a formal motion or interpleader did not deprive the court of jurisdiction, as the application was made in interlocutory proceedings and the applicants were served and heard.
Source excerpt
Explore more
