Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Ghana decisions
Decisions matching the current search
REPUBLIC VRS. TETTEH AND ANOTHER (D2/30/20) [2025] GHACC 28 (26 February 2025)
The Circuit Court at Tema convicted two accused persons of conspiracy and robbery, relying on victim identification, tracking evidence, and phone records.
REPUBLIC VRS AMADU (3/01/2025) [2025] GHADC 37 (21 February 2025)
The District Court at Dambai acquitted Mohammed Amadu of causing harm, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was the attacker.
Asamoah v S (CR/0337/2024) [2025] GHAHC 128 (28 January 2025)
The High Court upheld the robbery conviction, finding the evidence supported identification and involvement, but reduced the robbery sentence from 20 to 15 years.
REPUBLIC VRS. ADJAIDOO AND OTHERS (CCD/CC1/51/24) [2025] GHACC 6 (8 January 2025)
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the person who committed the offence or conspired with others, as the evidence was based on suspicion and probabilities, with no direct or cogent circumstantial evidence linking the accused to the crime. The prosecution's failure to call the complainant as a witness and to establish proper identification created reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal.
Source excerpt
REPUBLIC VRS ALI (B7/27/2024) [2024] GHACC 273 (24 July 2024)
The court convicted Taufik Ali of robbery after finding the complainant’s identification reliable and rejecting his claim that a confession was obtained under duress.
MAAMAH VRS. REPUBLIC (CR/0121/2024) [2024] GHAHC 280 (24 July 2024)
The High Court partly allowed a criminal appeal, upholding conspiracy to rob but setting aside robbery, and reducing the conspiracy sentence from 15 to 10 years.
REPUBLIC VRS ADAMS (D21/30/22) [2024] GHACC 54 (31 January 2024)
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was part of the robbery, as there was no direct identification, the circumstantial evidence was inconsistent and insufficient, and the accused's explanation was reasonably probable.
Source excerpt
Republic Vrs Francis Dugbaza [2023] GHACC 406 (8 December 2023)
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle, as the key witnesses who could identify the accused were not called to testify.
Source excerpt
REPUBLIC VRS AGBOVI (7/10/2024) [2023] GHADC 1145 (25 September 2023)
The court found that the accused, by returning at night and falsely representing himself as sent by the complainant, dishonestly appropriated the yams without the owner's consent, satisfying all elements of the offence of stealing.
Source excerpt
REPUBLIC VRS PRINCE AND OTHER (D1/55/2023) [2023] GHACC 752 (14 August 2023)
The prosecution failed to lead sufficient and reliable evidence of identification, and the accused's alibi was reasonably probable, creating doubt as to guilt. The prosecution did not prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
Explore more
