REPUBLIC VRS ALHASSAN & 3 OTHERS (C10/12/2022)
REPUBLIC VRS ALHASSAN & 3 OTHERS (C10/12/2022) [2024] GHAHC 188 (25 July 2024)
The Respondents had notice of the judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Sampa Traditional Council, which restrained them from dealing with the Twafo stool of Sampa. Despite this, they willfully disobeyed the judgment by parading the 4th Respondent as Twafohene. The alleged inconsistencies and claims of fraud do not affect the validity of the judgment, which remains binding until set aside. The Applicant, as customary successor, has capacity to bring the application. The Respondents are therefore liable for contempt beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
- Committal for contempt
- Chieftaincy disputes
- Enforcement of tribunal judgments
- Standard of proof in contempt proceedings