24 May 2012
JAH v. VH
- Citation
- JAH v. VH
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC4402/2010
The court ruled that the summons was an inter partes application with abridged time rather than an ex parte application and that limited interim asset restraint orders, narrowly tailored to protect assets already the subject of the consent order, were justified pending a full hearing in the High Court; the initial wider order was too broad and is discharged/narrowed; the case is to be transferred to the High Court and costs reserved.